TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Zach Gowen Fired (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=4696)

Boondock Saint 02-04-2004 07:11 PM

Zach Gowen Fired
 
from the main page...

The following statement was just posted on WWE.com:

WWE elected today to end its contractual relationship with Zach Gowen after Zach met with EVP of Talent Relations Jim Ross earlier today. “Zach is only 20 years of age and I would be very surprised if we don’t see him in a WWE ring again some day," Ross said. "We all have great respect for Zach’s passion and wish him nothing but success.”

Ian 02-04-2004 07:13 PM

Of coures he will be back.

ilt_undertaker 02-04-2004 07:13 PM

<font color=Silver>YEAH! GOOD! BOUT TIME!!!!!!! Now, the WWE is gonna get sued</font>

Dazz 02-04-2004 07:13 PM

I was wondering what happened to him.

IMO he was never going to be a big success, he was good to start with because he is different.

Dazz 02-04-2004 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilt_undertaker
<font color=Silver>YEAH! GOOD! BOUT TIME!!!!!!! Now, the WWE is gonna get sued</font>

By who?

Hardcore Legend 02-04-2004 07:14 PM

He was never likely to be any more than a bad circus act, props to the guy for his bravery in the face of adversity & all that but unfortunately the kind of novelty he brought can only last so long

Ricky 02-04-2004 07:14 PM

Good luck in your career at mcdonalds.

Kane Knight 02-04-2004 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilt_undertaker
<font color=Silver>YEAH! GOOD! BOUT TIME!!!!!!! Now, the WWE is gonna get sued</font>

Zack can sue, but he hasn't got a leg to stand on...

BigDaddyCool 02-04-2004 07:16 PM

meh, Zach sucked anyhow.

Fryza 02-04-2004 07:16 PM

meh..

Dazz 02-04-2004 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight
Zack can sue, but he hasn't got a leg to stand on...

:rofl:

Ian 02-04-2004 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight
Zack can sue, but he hasn't got a leg to stand on...

And you said my joke was bad. lol

Ricky 02-04-2004 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight
Zack can sue, but he hasn't got a leg to stand on...

LOL

PoisonIvy 02-04-2004 07:19 PM

Bout time I hate that lil pisser.

Kane Knight 02-04-2004 07:20 PM

BTW, I agree with the notion that he was only really pushed in the WWE as a sideshow attraction.

I don't approve of it, but it's true.

ilt_undertaker 02-04-2004 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dazz
By who?

<font color=Silver>Zach Gowen, who else?</font>

Disturbed316 02-04-2004 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight
Zack can sue, but he hasn't got a leg to stand on...

rofl

ColdwaVer 02-04-2004 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight
Zack can sue, but he hasn't got a leg to stand on...

*rimshot*

I may disagree with you on many points, but I can't deny, you've got style.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilt_undertaker
<font color=Silver>Zach Gowen, who else?</font>

Yeah, because you can sue for being released from a company. WWE may be clueless when it comes to booking and writing, but they're not stupid when it comes to these things.

Innovator 02-04-2004 07:33 PM

It's about time the WWE got sued again, I mean c'mon it's been 2 years without a lawsuit. The best TV is when they are getting sued.

Dazz 02-04-2004 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilt_undertaker
<font color=Silver>Zach Gowen, who else?</font>

And for what reason can he sue? they didn't discriminate, they release lots of people.

Funky Fly 02-04-2004 08:13 PM

True. He had a pretty big push.

If Sean O' Haire or Paul London or Ultimo Dragon had those high profile matches and exposure he had, I'm sure they'd be in a much better spot than they are now.

Kane Knight 02-04-2004 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jbone829
It's about time the WWE got sued again, I mean c'mon it's been 2 years without a lawsuit. The best TV is when they are getting sued.

God no. Bad enough we had to sit through the Right to Censor...

Kane Knight 02-04-2004 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dazz
And for what reason can he sue? they didn't discriminate, they release lots of people.

He can claim discrimination.

He'll get laughed out of court on a meritless suit...

People can sue for any reason...I doubt it'll happen tho.

Disturbed316 02-04-2004 08:16 PM

Well aparantly his attitude stunk, so its probably for the best.

Back to TNA maybe?

Blitz 02-04-2004 08:41 PM

Not suprised in the least. Before Zach even got signed, he thought he was the best thing in wrestling. Being a one legged 19 year old who got a WWE contract after trainng for a year certainly didn't shrink his ego. His ego was easily his biggest handicap, not his leg. I'm going to an indie show on Sunday, and I'm sure he'll be there, bitching about how unfairly he was treated.

Innovator 02-04-2004 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight
God no. Bad enough we had to sit through the Right to Censor...

RTC or not, it was the most airtime Steven Richards got to date

CosaNostra 02-04-2004 11:42 PM

Its not everyday that a person gets a WWE contract; even a short term one. Doing it when you are that young by itself is an accomplisment, let alone doing it for a while with only one leg.

Sure his novelty as a handicapped wrestler may have been one of his major drawing points (if any) but he was still able to hang in there for a while, which is more than any of us can claim.

Head 02-04-2004 11:49 PM

He could sue, but the fact is that he didn't draw, and they had him in the main event for about a month straight.

Fryza 02-04-2004 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dazz
And for what reason can he sue? they didn't discriminate, they release lots of people.

Stupid and irrelevant reason to file a lawsuit.

Hasn't stopped anyone before..McDonalds will tell you that..

Kane Knight 02-04-2004 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosanostra1971
Its not everyday that a person gets a WWE contract; even a short term one. Doing it when you are that young by itself is an accomplisment, let alone doing it for a while with only one leg.

Sure his novelty as a handicapped wrestler may have been one of his major drawing points (if any) but he was still able to hang in there for a while, which is more than any of us can claim.

'Course, most people here haven't tried to get into the biz...Apples and cinder blocks.

ilt_undertaker 02-04-2004 11:56 PM

<font color=Silver>Im glad he's gone, and i hope he doesnt come back to TNA b/c he (IMO) doesnt belong in the X-Division</font>

HeartBreakMan2k 02-05-2004 12:01 AM

Gowen is impressive for who he is, he's a very impressive young man who over came a lot of odds. However, just because he can do a few spots, doesn't mean he is a great worker. TNA was able to cover this up due to the size of their rings, he just doesn't look realistic in the WWE. He was brought in for ratings, he had to know that. He didn't garner the ratings, his attitude was supposedly shitty, he isn't that great of an in ring worker, So in my opinion, congrats to him for living his dream for a few matches, but he shouldn't be involved with the company.

Kane Knight 02-05-2004 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HeartBreakKid2k
Gowen is impressive for who he is, he's a very impressive young man who over came a lot of odds. However, just because he can do a few spots, doesn't mean he is a great worker. TNA was able to cover this up due to the size of their rings, he just doesn't look realistic in the WWE. He was brought in for ratings, he had to know that. He didn't garner the ratings, his attitude was supposedly shitty, he isn't that great of an in ring worker, So in my opinion, congrats to him for living his dream for a few matches, but he shouldn't be involved with the company.

:y:

Pretty well said.

And it's impressive for anyone with 1 leg to be that mobile...But he wasn't that great a wrestler. The continuing entertainment value was pretty low beyond the novelty of how impressive the kid is.

Plus, the Irish Whip thing looked pretty dumb.

John la Rock 02-05-2004 12:26 AM

I think the WWE did the right thing. Gowen is an amazing story and deserves to return to the WWE some time in the future. He's only 20 ****ing years old. If were to ever come back he'll need to improve his promo ability cause he sucks ass in that category.

And yes there will be a lawsuit

Pepsi Man 02-05-2004 12:27 AM

What the hell? He comes into the WWE, puts over Vince, goes over Hardy, gets beaten up by Lesnar, and leaves? :-\

HeartBreakMan2k 02-05-2004 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John la Rock
And yes there will be a lawsuit

It won't hold any merit of course, however if Gowen is half as bad as reports said then of course he'll try it.

Boondock Saint 02-05-2004 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pepsi Man
What the hell? He comes into the WWE, puts over Vince, goes over Hardy, gets beaten up by Lesnar, and leaves? :-\

Goes over Hardy. :nono: :wtf:

Corkscrewed 02-05-2004 12:48 AM

Eh... he would have gotten boring like the hardcore title, so I guess it's the best. If his attitude was indeed selfish, then I don't feel as sympathetic.

CosaNostra 02-05-2004 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight
'Course, most people here haven't tried to get into the biz...Apples and cinder blocks.

True........but in the same vein, most of those same people are realistic in realizing that they couldn't even if they tried. We both know how tough the training is and how hard that kind of life is. We couldn't cut it, let alone hack it.

I understand that Zach isn't a phenom, not by any stretch of the imagination. And just because he is handicapped doesn't mean his ego isn't. He is just as prone to back stage melodrama like the rest of them. But business is business and if he can't cut it - goodbye.......and no hard feelings. What was expected of him is a little unrealistic. I mean, getting put over by Matt Hardy? :wtf:

All I am saying is that its an impressive accomplishment for a guy like that to make it for a little while - especially since most of us non-handicapped people couldn't if we tried.

Pepsi Man 02-05-2004 01:01 AM

I'm 5'9", either 144.25 lbs., or I may have even dropped back to my previous 136 weight, judging by the way my pants fit...and I don't have a single day's worth of athletic experience...

STILL, I refuse to say that, "If I tried, I couldn't ever make it to the WWE."


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®