| Kalyx triaD |
06-30-2006 02:56 PM |
When I got my ticket it read, "Superman 5". Interesting; wouldn't it be Superman 3? Or just Superman Returns? I have a right to be confused, because its pretty clear Bryan Singer is confused as well. He doesn't know whether to make his own movie or make a sequel (which is what this is). When I read everything about the movie prior to it's release I seen things like 'nods' and 'homages' to the Donner/Lester films. To my joy/disappointment, he relied much to heavily on these 'nods' to the point where knowledge of the first two films were required to enjoy the movie (lines, jokes, blah-blah). Singer is a good director, but I can't help but feel his own Reeves Era fanboyism gave us an inferior Superman movie. It's only as good as the Donner films, but never surpasses.
Sounds Like Superman 3:
Make no mistake, its a sequel. Not 'spiritual sequel'; sequel. The music composer said in an interview that he was gonna use bits of the Williams' score along with an original piece. It's John Williams all the way, which isn't bad at all. Some notes were changed and lines were extended, but it's the same soundtrack. A running theme in my review here will be Creative Laziness. Where does the homages stop and the shortcuts begin? This movie sadly blurs the line quite a bit.
Looks Like Superman 3:
Here's the biggest problem with use of Reeves era production visuals; Smallville's doing the same thing. The Reeves Era movies are one of those film adaptions that are so well done, they end up influencing further adaptions of the franchise. As far as Krypton is concerned in live action, it MUST be the crystal version. At this point it's all we know. Knowing this going in, couldn't Singer have tied this movie to Smallville in some way? It's abit jumbled to have two different versions of Superman right now sharing the Reeves Era mythology. This isn't a problem to me, a Kal-El geek; but the masses wouldn't be able to tell the difference.
Creative Laziness:
I'm not gonna call Singer untalented, but he took the easiest way out possible in doing a Superman movie: Pick the most well-known and popular version and add to it. Unlike X3 director Bret Rattner who had little choice but to work off Singer's work, Bryan willingly went for an established route, most of the work in production being recasting, remodeling, and updating the suit. Its as if Singer hid behind Richard Donner's legs as he feared backlash from fanboys who's words hit harder than Doomsday. Why, Singer, couldn't you just reintroduce us to the Man of Steel with a origin story? Batman Begins did nothing but benefit from it. What urks me is Singer spent alot of interview time talking about homages and in-jokes, when it wasn't the case. Smallville has homages and in-jokes to previous Superman products; Superman Returns downright needs these refferences to stand on. Superman 3 (2006) is good, but Superman Begins would've been awesome.
Superboy:
Now that I'm past that rant, let's move on. Superman has a little boy. Cute throwback to part 2's offscreen love scene between Supes and Lois. Singer even expected us to remember that her memory was erased (that's not a rant). The cool thing is I was surprised at something I should've thought possible. It's just that I didn't know the extend of the connection 'Returns was gonna be to the Reeves Era. Singer kept it very low-key, with only three scenes motioning us to the point (Lex's inquiry being the only one needed). I would've liked that Superman never really finds out, and the kid be named Conner as well. That's me.
Kitty:
I actually like her place in the movie. It was clearly underhyped as compared to Kal Penn's place in the film. She kinda frizzled out at the end, though. No clear redemption to speak of. Would Lex really keep her around after she literally tosses out Lex's plans at "giving fire to the people (and getting his cut)"? Hope she returns for part 4.
Richard:
I wonder how James Mardsen feels to be given more screen time and resonance in a movie barely about him than he did in a team superhero movie where he was playing the leader? Anyway, I really wanna dislike Richard (fictionally speaking). He took Superman's girl! Knocked her up even! But he's a real good guy in the end. Any of his jokes against Clark are well recieved. I mean, don't we all think little of the shy geeky dude in the office? I hope he returns as well.
I'm very happy story-wise that Superman doesn't get Lois in the end. I guess Superboy is his own personal victory in that plot. Unless he calls Maury.
Clark Kent:
I see what reviewers mean by this Clark lacking the dept of Reeves Clark. Routh more or less gets the basics down anyway, so I don't mind. Remember, this kid is super-new to the game. I suspect he'll be the best Superman/Clark/Kal-El after a movie or two down the line.
Lois:
Aside from throwbacks to her smoking, spelling, and fainting after a save from Superman; this just isn't a believable Lois. Smallville's Lois hits it home in better fashion.
Luther:
Perfect. Moving on.
Superman:
I love Routh as Superman. He's like Michael Turner's streamlined Superman come to life. He's much more convincing in action than on the (intentionally) bad press photos released way back. I already got used to the suit, but you really don't notice the difference when he's going to work. Absolutly loved the 1st Appearance cover shot, the Atlas homage (that's a homage), the Christ pose, yellowish heat-vision (makes sense!), and just that super-boyscout look in his eye when he's being of all things polite for us lowly humans. It seems like you can hurt his feelings by saying something wrong, which is a true face for Superman and an awesome contrast to Batman's demonic mask (can't wait till they put those two on screen).
"Birthday Clown Massacre"? Get it? Get it?!?
I loved the movie, I just feel like others can't love it as I can because of what I know and they don't with the Reeves Era movies. Maybe everybody seen them anyway. Maybe no one cares. It's Superman, not the best it could be, but as good as it gets for now.
Bryan Singer and Ang Lee should hang out. They both have the same beliefs on comic-movie action...
|