TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Should The Undertaker retire within the next 2 years? (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=48665)

James Steele 07-25-2006 10:23 PM

Should The Undertaker retire within the next 2 years?
 
A serious Undertaker topic.

Dorkchop 07-25-2006 10:25 PM

Yes. He's doing a whole lot of nothing.

But only if he can rest in peaces

The One 07-25-2006 10:31 PM

Do we really need to wait 2 years. Can't he just job at Mania and go away?

AJHayes 07-25-2006 10:39 PM

Nah, have him go undefeated, win one of the titles and go out on top, the way he deserves to go out. He kept the company afloat for a long time; so, I feel that his loyalty and dedication deserves to be rewarded.

loopydate 07-25-2006 10:44 PM

He didn't keep shit afloat. WWF was within a couple of years of being bought out by WCW with him at the top of the card. It wasn't until Austin (who I hate, if possible, more than Undertaker) came along that the WWF turned itself around. If anybody kept the company afloat during those years it was Hart (who I disrespect, if possible, somewhere in between Austin and Undertaker) and Michaels.

He should have retired in '02 after a short run as the Badass. He's been hanging on way too long.

The One 07-25-2006 10:45 PM

The millions of dollars, barely ever having to job, being a star for years, isn't payment enough?

The One 07-25-2006 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loopydate
He didn't keep shit afloat. WWF was within a couple of years of being bought out by WCW with him at the top of the card. It wasn't until Austin (who I hate, if possible, more than Undertaker) came along that the WWF turned itself around. If anybody kept the company afloat during those years it was Hart (who I disrespect, if possible, somewhere in between Austin and Undertaker) and Michaels.

Funny I was going to say something to this effect (minus the Austin disliking) but couldn't word it that well...thanks for doing it for me.

Destor 07-25-2006 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BelfastBomber
Nah, have him go undefeated, win one of the titles and go out on top, the way he deserves to go out. He kept the company afloat for a long time; so, I feel that his loyalty and dedication deserves to be rewarded.

EVERYONE should loose their last match. The business relies on the stars of today making the stars of tomorrow. On the topic, definitely. Give him the strap sometime this year or the next then lay down the prep-work for a memorable good bye culminating at Survivor Series.

Dorkchop 07-25-2006 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BelfastBomber
Nah, have him go undefeated, win one of the titles and go out on top, the way he deserves to go out. He kept the company afloat for a long time; so, I feel that his loyalty and dedication deserves to be rewarded.

I'm both for and against Taker losing at Wrestlemania.

They could build up a feud between Taker and someone for Mania. Have his opponent lose, but keep building the feud until Summerslam or Survivor Series (If they want to drag it out for as long as possible).

Dorkchop 07-25-2006 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destor
EVERYONE should loose their last match. The business relies on the stars of today making the stars of tomorrow. On the topic, definitely. Give him the strap sometime this year or the next then lay down the prep-work for a memorable good bye culminating at Survivor Series.

Survivor Series seems like the best ppv to have Undertaker's last match. I don't know why, I just think of Undertaker when I hear about Survivor Series (not all the time though). Didn't he have some memorable Survivor Series moments in the 90s?

Destor 07-25-2006 10:57 PM

Yeah, he debuted there.

loopydate 07-25-2006 11:12 PM

1990 - Debuted

1991 - Won first World Title from Hulk Hogan

1992 - First casket match against Kamala

1993 - Had first "patriotic" moment, teaming with Lex Luger and the Steiners against Yokozuna, Crush, Ludvig Borga, and Jacques Rougeau

1994 - Beat Yokozuna in another casket match (CHUCK NORRIS was the enforcer)

1995 - Returned after King Mabel crushed his face. Single-handedly eliminated Mabel's team (Mabel, Jerry Lawler, Isaac Yankem, and Hunter Hearst-Helmsley)

1996 - Avenged his Summerslam Boiler Room Brawl loss to Mankind by beating him.

1997 - Wasn't booked

1998 - Lost to The Rock in the semis of the Deadly Game tournament by DQ

1999 - Wasn't booked

2000 - False finish in title match against Kurt Angle (pinned Eric Angle)

2001 - Was part of "Team WWF" against "Team WCW." Pinned by Angle.

2002 - Wasn't booked.

2003 - Buried alive by Vince McMahon

2004 - Beat Hei-Den-Reich

2005 - Wasn't booked

James Steele 07-25-2006 11:13 PM

I think they just need to find a new way to "kill off" the Undertaker and make it a way that everybody knows that he is done for good. Buried Alive won't work, Hell In A Cell won't work, even a simple "career vs. title" or whatever match won't work.

Kane Knight 07-25-2006 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The One
Do we really need to wait 2 years. Can't he just job 2 years ago and go away?


DaveWadding 07-25-2006 11:23 PM

He should have retired 2 years ago.

Fox 07-25-2006 11:24 PM

So, what? An in-ring decapitation?

Dorkchop 07-25-2006 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JamesSteele
I think they just need to find a new way to "kill off" the Undertaker and make it a way that everybody knows that he is done for good. Buried Alive won't work, Hell In A Cell won't work, even a simple "career vs. title" or whatever match won't work.

The only thing I can think fo right now is something like Kane and Undertaker's last match against each other ever (one of them has to go type dealy). It could be like an armageddon (not the ppv) type of booking. Maybe have a few run ins during the match (Write it into the storyline so they're not just running in for no unexplained reason), but have the run ins fail. Somehow eventually Kane wins on his own.

I think Kane still has a couple of years left in him (he has more, but probably is retiring soon-ish), and if Taker is sticking around for a couple more years, have them both lose/die or something at that match.

If Taker is going soon, maybe do something like in my first paragraph.

OverTaker 07-25-2006 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fox
So, what? An in-ring decapitation?

No, like in the end of Braveheart. Or wait, that did happen.

Fox 07-26-2006 08:14 PM

In all seriousness, Undertaker should put somebody over before he leaves. Because frankly, he never fucking does it, and he really owes the current and future fans of the WWE, especially after stinking up the ring for the past 3 years.

TakerLover 07-29-2006 02:04 AM

NOOO, even Randy Orton said that Taker gets the most cheers. he is that damn good.

R.I.P. :mad:

Lux 07-29-2006 02:08 AM

I KILLED UNDERTAKER BITCH

TakerLover 07-29-2006 02:09 AM

FUCK OFF COCKEATER

Lux 07-29-2006 02:10 AM

ASS BLASTER, GO FUCK THE UNDERTAKER

Kane Knight 07-29-2006 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TakerLover
NOOO, even Randy Orton said that Taker gets the most cheers. he is that damn good.

R.I.P. :mad:

Actually, that's not a good thing.

owenbrown 07-29-2006 10:51 AM

I think even Trey Parker and Matt Stone could "kill off" The Undertaker just like they did Kenny on South Park and yet he will still come back. :shifty:

Chavo Classic 07-29-2006 10:57 AM

If they were to build up a feud with some random young talent and the UT leading to said individual beating the Undertaker at Wrestlemania, and consequently retiring him then they'd have a star for life.

So, until they find someone worthy enough for this role then UT's job is safe

road doggy dogg 07-29-2006 11:53 AM

rofl


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®