Ken Kennedy (Spoilers from tonight's airing of Smackdown, 07/28/06)
 

Okay, you cocksmokers have a spoiler warning.

Anyway, you think his "undefeated" streak vs Batista is gonna go somewhere positive for Mister Kennedy? I know it's only 2 matches, and neither by pin or submission, but I can't imagine the WWE screwing up a push...

...Wait...

Well, they definitely need some stars, and quick. It'd be in their best interest to make Mr. Kennedy look good about now.

Hopefully it does. Didn't Matt Hardy have some kind of streak against The Undertaker a few years back, though...:(

Kennedy Did good-he does not suck...Nice head dress Tanaka!

Wanna find out what Indian pride is about? :naughty:

did you guys notice they put this up on wwe.com at like 1pm today? We know its pretaped, but wwe.com plays it off still. When i saw this, i got up, pointed at my monitor and began chanting 'you fuck up, you fucked up'.

EDIT: aw, its not there anymore, but the graphic had Kennedys face on the left with Batista in the ring i believe on the upper right.

Could you make a little more sense?

WWE posted the graphic with the 2nd win as if Smackdown was shown already today at 12 noon. Better? Hmm....it is better.

You want to have Indian sex with Me?...You are a Native American Knight person....I will only sleep with you if you look like Johnny or Carlito or Juvy

Only...Completely.

Kennedy was getting pushed, then injury, then he comes back, very much over, and still getting pushed, and then.....loses to matt HArdy

No chance he is getting any push, he was just the only guy for batista to fuck up.

Only Batista has lost to him twice. :|

..........Tanaka isn't a native american.......

EDIT- Highlight for the meaning!

Fucking dipshits! Tanaka is from Japan! Masato Tanaka! Used to be in ECW? Ring any bells? Far be it for me to claim to have perfect spelling, but a name is a big deal.

What else would you expect from korinkahn.

The fact that KK didn't notice it makes baby jesus cry.

I think he noticed...he just didn't care.

Shadow had it right.

Like I said, this whole thing makes little chronological sense. And that's what happens when your writers don't have wrestling writing experience until they start writing. They end up overlooking things.

Kennedy never should have lost to Hardy. Period.

Like I said as Well, Corky. It's not like it's a new thought. However, Kennedy is now being featured against BAtista. Assuming they don't fuck this one up, as well...

Give the man the US title! I'd love to see a Kennedy/Lashley feud.

This is what will happen, they'll go with Kennedy being undefeated against Batista, until Summerslam when it all comes to a screeching halt, and then move on as if nothing ever happened.

God, you STILL haven't learned, have you?

Never tempt KK to have gay sex. He wants it anyway he can get it. :lol: :p

*gives kk an apple*

Wanna spit or swallow? :shifty:

Spit/Swallow? Depends on the relationship
http://www.beast-video.com/video_lis.../KBEA031_4.jpg

*whispers*

darkpower: :eek: DAS NOT COOL!

Mistaaa....Kennedy is the future bull shit and the future is now

Hey PWF, you've been <s>KKK'd!</s> BS'd!
 

GROOOOOOOAN!

Would they dispell KAYFABE myths every week?

Well, to be fair, they probably wanted to bring him there so he could show up and then they could raise the lights.

By the way, I was talking about Penn and Teller's show, in which they "dispell" myths. While it's not true that they use the facts (In fact, as I've mentioined before, they "dispelled" Global Warming, in part, by indicating the theory of Global Cooling used to be a wisespread belief...Which is the equivalent of indicating that the current creation belief held by the majority of Americans is that we were created by the ejaculating of Kane Knight's Penis), the concept of the show is dispelling myths. Hence the comment. I wasn't particularly worried about them actually breaking KAYFABE...Just imagining what Ken and Teller would do.

See, you always bring up the Global Warming thing, but I have not seen this. I saw the episode on ghosts they did, which was a bit of an insult to me. I'm an avid ghost hunter, and the show they did on the topic featured the worst footage from the most inept hunters I"ve ever seen. A fairly biased set-up. And granted, they freely admit that when they do a show, when they interview someone for a point contrary to their own opinion, the interviewee knows it. And they are also very clear on what they feel is true. But on actual human relations topics, trying to claim that they don't base their theories on fact is pretty baseless, in and of itself.




....Kennedyyyy....

I've only seen about 6 episodes total, and I only bring up the Global warming one because it's one of two where I know they skewed. The other one is recycling, where they say it's actually more efficient to create new materials than to recycle old ones. Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying this is completely false--It's just only true for some materials.

Anyway, it's my opinion that if you're going to claim to dispell myths, you should probably do it from an objective point of view. If you do it from a biased point of view, you should probably not do so from a point that's hard to verify.

Penn and Teller's Bullshit, while entertaining, is the equivalent of using Ann Coulter to counter Michael Moore's lies, or vice versa (They're both full of shit).