![]() |
Couldnt WWE sue TNA over this?
http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/5...sionlrghc2.jpg
https://secure15.nexternal.com/share...t=products.asp That X-Division shirt was obviously designed to look like the DX shirt.... |
When Vince sees that....he'll try to slap a lawsuit on TNA faster than you can say Six Sides Sucks
|
$50 says Vince might hear about the shirt, but will never actually look at the shirt in question...
But yeah law suites are comin! |
Why sue? It makes TNA look even more like the 'D Show' it is. They're just admitting the influence WWE (and DX for that matter) has on merch and public awareness. If Vince sues it would be a bonus for him, but I wouldn't bother. I'd laugh my ass to another PPV.
|
I sure hope so.
|
I thought it said Jew Generation X at first glance.
|
The answers are most likely and ummmm....most likely.
Now I know this has been done before but... Chris FUCKING Daniels, and Sabin. |
Parody
|
Quote:
Go figure. Anyway, it's a stretch to say this actually infringes on established trademarks, and all Vince would do is give free publicity to TNA. I doubt anything'll come of this. |
So SNL/Leno/etc. have to have rights to do the things they do? :?:
|
They could but like KK said, it would only benifit TNA really.
|
Quote:
|
So they own the letter X and the phrase "Two words..."
|
Quote:
I however still own the letter F and i'm not giving it back |
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...7----000-.html http://laws.lp.findlaw.com/11th/0112200opnv2.html ...and the Wikipedia article on Parody (with sources cited at bottom). Nowhere does it say they had to pay licensing fees for their parody. And further research lends me to believe that no makers of parodies require to pay any kind of fee. It's covered under "Fair Use" in U.S. law. Unless you were talking about UK law or some other law, in which case I haven't the faintest fucking clue. :) |
OOOOh pwnd
|
Quote:
That is, my single-celled friend, within the contexts of the shirt, it is easy enough to prove this infringes on already established intellectual property. |
Quote:
|
Though interestingly enough, your links do prove that this is not guaranteed to be protected as an act of parody.
|
You can wake up now...
Quote:
|
Ohhh...Answers.com. BRILLIANT. I didn't see that anywhere on the US actual web page. Hmmmm...
And even your own answer gives an "or" there. I don't know, this seems far from actual proof. Note that's a catch-all for fair use, not copyright specifically. |
Quote:
Damnit. Hands Dave 20 bucks. |
Oy vey. The TNA shirt doesn't even use specific logos. They may have copied the STYLE, but that's far from infringement. They DO own their X-Division logo, I'm sure.
|
TNA needs to just stop being a bunch of fags by constantly taking shots at Vince and WWE, and concentrate on their own product.
It shows they are desperate and they look pathetic. Having their guys say "Oooh I used to wrestle for Vince and he was a bastard, but I love TNA, I want to fuck the management in the ass. TNA RULESSS!! WWE SUX!!!" Seriously, I wish TNA would just either die or stop acting so pathetic and childish. |
I can't believe no one has pointed out that idiotic fucking look on Sabins face.
|
Sabin looks like an idiot.
|
Dunno...he could be just looking normal...which to us, he looks like an idiot
|
Quote:
It seems stypid, but it's law. |
Quote:
|
I think it's parody. First you'll have to prove it's not protected speech.
|
I doubt WWE would win a lawsuit if they file one for this.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
...so far. |
Quote:
|
It's really hard to sue yourself.
But if Vince wants to I guess he can. |
I think TNA could get away with this. I mean, couldn't Marvel sue the WWE for using DX, claiming they own X-Men, and thus people would get confused?
Maybe if the shirt more specifically played off the DX concept, and was green and black or had the quote "I've got two words for ya'...No Limits!". The shirt doesn't directly play off DX's success, and even if the WWE did draw the connection, it is more media attention for TNA, something the WWE doesn't want. They could probably argue it away, anyway. If a Cola company puts a red label on its brand, would Coca Cola be able to sue? |
Decent example: The makers of Zoom were sued by Marvel for infringment upon The Fantastic Four. What's better, they said the books "Zoom's Academy" or whatever didn't qualify as infringement.
Trademark infringement is a touchy thing. On the one hand, you can lose a suit for a passing similarity. On the other, you can get away with borderline plagiarism. Another example, more of the latter, is the Captain America rip-off that was made by a former captain America writer. I don't remember the name, but the character was dressed similar to captain America, and carried a shield with a SSB motif. A judge in this case ruled that it was okay, provided the character never threw the shield. However, a Darkwing Duck episode was pulled because it played on Spider-Man (Radioactive Spider). But long story short: No. In the case of Trademark law, it's all about market confusion. Marvel would have to prove that DX and the X-Men were within the same market and were similar enough to draw some form of endorsement, detract from business, or cause some form of similar "market confusion" effect. The two are not similar enough for someone to draw that conclusion reasonably. A shirt with a big green X and "Two Words?" Yeah, this would be a lot easier to argue in court. |
Big RED x ;)
|
When I am elected high Chanchellor of Earth, this will not be a problem.
Vote for Hanso 2078 "A vote for me, is a vote against the parasitic aliens that destroyed our way of life" |
If 'Vince' thought he could sue and win, he still might not simply because he'd be giving TNA publicity.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®