TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   sports forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   The Bears are going 16-0 (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=52276)

Triple A 10-09-2006 06:42 PM

The Bears are going 16-0
 
Look at their remaining schedule.

Only tough games could be @ the Giants and @ the Pats, but they could also easily win those games.

Oct 16 @Arizona 8:30pm 125 123
Week 7 BYE
Oct 29 San Francisco 1:00pm 130 119
Nov 5 Miami 1:00pm 144
Nov 12 @N.Y. Giants 1:00pm 147 152
Nov 19 @N.Y. Jets 1:00pm 146 146
Nov 26 @New England 1:00pm 117 107
Dec 3 Minnesota 1:00pm 146 123
Dec 11 @St. Louis 8:30pm 125 123
Dec 17 Tampa Bay 1:00pm 125
Dec 24 @Detroit 1:00pm 122 181
Dec 31 Green Bay 1:00pm 143 147

BCWWF 10-09-2006 06:54 PM

It will either be @ New England or Tampa Bay that ends it, @ Giants is a possibility too.

Nervous Ferret 10-09-2006 06:55 PM

Dec 3 Minnestoa. BANK ON IT

Jesus Shuttlesworth 10-09-2006 06:57 PM

Yeah they are definetly going to lose atleast once, I dunno when or where but the odds are too great!!!!!!!

Seriously tho watch them go 15-1 with their one loss coming thanks to like the Lions or something

Nervous Ferret 10-09-2006 06:57 PM

Well might as well ask, which is more likely:

The Bears going 16-0 ot the Raiders going 0-16? Raiders remaining schedule to follow.

Nervous Ferret 10-09-2006 06:57 PM

<TABLE class=homeSched cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 align=center border=0><TBODY><TR class=rowEven><TD>10/15</TD><TD>http://www.raiders.com/uploads/graph...-den-small.gif </TD><TD>at DEN</TD><TD>5:15 pm</TD></TR><TR class=rowOdd><TD>10/22</TD><TD>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameda...rdinals-dk.gif </TD><TD class=home>vs ARI</TD><TD>1:15 pm</TD></TR><TR class=rowEven><TD>10/29</TD><TD>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameda...teelers-dk.gif </TD><TD class=home>vs PIT</TD><TD>1:15 pm</TD></TR><TR class=rowOdd><TD>11/6</TD><TD>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameday/tm-seahawks.gif </TD><TD>at SEA</TD><TD>5:30 pm</TD></TR><TR class=rowEven><TD>11/12</TD><TD>http://www.raiders.com/uploads/graph...-den-small.gif </TD><TD class=home>vs DEN</TD><TD>1:05 pm*</TD></TR><TR class=rowOdd><TD>11/19</TD><TD>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameday/tm-chiefs-dk.gif </TD><TD>at KC</TD><TD>10:00 am*</TD></TR><TR class=rowEven><TD>11/26</TD><TD>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameda...hargers-dk.gif </TD><TD>at SD</TD><TD>1:05 pm*</TD></TR><TR class=rowOdd><TD>12/3</TD><TD>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameday/tm-texans-dk.gif </TD><TD class=home>vs HOU</TD><TD>1:05 pm*</TD></TR><TR class=rowEven><TD>12/10</TD><TD>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameday/tm-bengals-dk.gif </TD><TD>at CIN</TD><TD>10:00 am*</TD></TR><TR class=rowOdd><TD>12/17</TD><TD>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameday/tm-rams-dk.gif </TD><TD class=home>vs STL</TD><TD>1:15 pm*</TD></TR><TR class=rowEven><TD>12/23</TD><TD>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameday/tm-chiefs-dk.gif </TD><TD class=home>vs KC</TD><TD>5:00 pm</TD></TR><TR class=rowOdd><TD>12/31</TD><TD>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameday/tm-jets-dk.gif </TD><TD>at NYJ</TD><TD>10:00 am*</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Triple A 10-09-2006 07:24 PM

lol @ Raiders

OssMan 10-09-2006 07:37 PM

Probably will but if anyone does end it it will prob be Minnesota, also the Seahawks have no reason to be anything worse than 15-1. They play in the NFC West so they automatically win 6 games and they have a retarded home field advantage they retired number 12 for the 12TH MAN the fans :roll:

OssMan 10-09-2006 07:38 PM

Raiders probably gonna beat ARI haha

Kris P Lettus 10-09-2006 07:44 PM

They will not go 16-0..

I'm thinking their first loss will be to the Pats..

OssMan 10-09-2006 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kris P Lettus
They will not go 16-0..

I'm thinking their first loss will be to the Pats..

who dat?

Kris P Lettus 10-09-2006 08:04 PM

http://www.tpww.net/forums/attachmen...1&d=1077407839

Jew Dat?!?!

Savio 10-09-2006 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nervous Ferret
<table class="homeSched" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="rowEven"><td>10/15</td><td>http://www.raiders.com/uploads/graph...-den-small.gif </td><td>at DEN</td><td>5:15 pm</td></tr><tr class="rowOdd"><td>10/22</td><td>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameda...rdinals-dk.gif </td><td class="home">vs ARI</td><td>1:15 pm</td></tr><tr class="rowEven"><td>10/29</td><td>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameda...teelers-dk.gif </td><td class="home">vs PIT</td><td>1:15 pm</td></tr><tr class="rowOdd"><td>11/6</td><td>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameday/tm-seahawks.gif </td><td>at SEA</td><td>5:30 pm</td></tr><tr class="rowEven"><td>11/12</td><td>http://www.raiders.com/uploads/graph...-den-small.gif </td><td class="home">vs DEN</td><td>1:05 pm*</td></tr><tr class="rowOdd"><td>11/19</td><td>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameday/tm-chiefs-dk.gif </td><td>at KC</td><td>10:00 am*</td></tr><tr class="rowEven"><td>11/26</td><td>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameda...hargers-dk.gif </td><td>at SD</td><td>1:05 pm*</td></tr><tr class="rowOdd"><td>12/3</td><td>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameday/tm-texans-dk.gif </td><td class="home">vs HOU</td><td>1:05 pm*</td></tr><tr class="rowEven"><td>12/10</td><td>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameday/tm-bengals-dk.gif </td><td>at CIN</td><td>10:00 am*</td></tr><tr class="rowOdd"><td>12/17</td><td>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameday/tm-rams-dk.gif </td><td class="home">vs STL</td><td>1:15 pm*</td></tr><tr class="rowEven"><td>12/23</td><td>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameday/tm-chiefs-dk.gif </td><td class="home">vs KC</td><td>5:00 pm</td></tr><tr class="rowOdd"><td>12/31</td><td>http://www.raiders.com/images/gameday/tm-jets-dk.gif </td><td>at NYJ</td><td>10:00 am*</td></tr></tbody></table>

Dunno I see the raiders beating the texans

I'd say NE and NYG being Bears toughest challenge.

Mr. Aristocrat 10-10-2006 09:54 PM

Bears are real solid on De this year, but let's not get crazy. I mean they certainly arn't the '85, and they are one injured Grossman away from getting their asses handed to them. And let's be honest, their win over Minnesota wasn't a blow out, and they kind of lucked out on a few plays. Still, I think they are looking like "The Team" of 06.

Pisser about losing that last TD at the VERY end last weekend. So close to to their second shut out.

Skippord 10-10-2006 10:54 PM

lol If the Broncos lost to the Raiders next week I will wear a frilly skirt around all week

Skippord 10-10-2006 10:54 PM

And I would post pics

road doggy dogg 10-10-2006 11:11 PM

Bears are the best team in the league. Probably like 14-2

Raiders will at least beat Houston.

road doggy dogg 10-10-2006 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joey J
Bears are real solid on De this year, but let's not get crazy. I mean they certainly arn't the '85, and they are one injured Grossman away from getting their asses handed to them. And let's be honest, their win over Minnesota wasn't a blow out, and they kind of lucked out on a few plays. Still, I think they are looking like "The Team" of 06.

Pisser about losing that last TD at the VERY end last weekend. So close to to their second shut out.

Can you tell me Kyle Orton's win/loss record

Mr. Aristocrat 10-10-2006 11:54 PM

With the Bears he had a record of 10-5. Trust me, my sister and dad are insane Bears fans. I can't be in the room with either of them without DAAAA BEARS convo comin up.

road doggy dogg 10-11-2006 12:00 AM

Exactly. Orton should never be near an NFL field, yet he still managed to drag along 10 wins playing for the Bears.

owenbrown 10-11-2006 12:27 AM

If the Raiders lose to the Texans they should no longer be an NFL team. They were the fucking AFC champs 4 years ago.

Mr. Monday Morning 10-11-2006 09:05 AM

I believe you are forgetting a Mr Brian Griese RDD

Joey Slugs 10-11-2006 12:34 PM

BTW: I LOVE this thread.

But like Peanut Tillman said last night in an interview, in order to go 16-0... you have to be 6-0. Take it one game at a time.

Jesus Shuttlesworth 10-11-2006 12:45 PM

I remember before the season started I heard stuff about how Griese was going to end up being the starter instead of Grossman lol

MVP 10-11-2006 01:27 PM

It'd be sweet if their first loss is against Pats.

Joey Slugs 10-12-2006 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sTiMa34
I remember before the season started I heard stuff about how Griese was going to end up being the starter instead of Grossman lol

Never from me. I thought that signing Griese was going to be the best thing to ever happen to Rex.

The Outlaw 10-12-2006 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by road doggy dogg
Raiders will at least beat Houston.

:mad:

CSL 10-17-2006 12:14 AM

<font color=white>23-10, 11:05 left in the 4thhhh...</font>

Jesus Shuttlesworth 10-17-2006 12:18 AM

Well I know I just posted this, but good thing the Raiders took Michael Huff over Matt Leinart.

RoXer 10-17-2006 12:21 AM

Andrew Walter doesn't really suck though.

CSL 10-17-2006 12:50 AM

<font color=white>Fuckin' hell.</font>

RoXer 10-17-2006 12:51 AM

OHHH MYYYYY

RoXer 10-17-2006 12:51 AM

PLEASE DONT MISS A FG NEIL RACKERS PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE

Jesus Shuttlesworth 10-17-2006 12:53 AM

hahahah THE U

http://media.theinsiders.com/media/image/16/168076.jpg

Jesus Shuttlesworth 10-17-2006 12:56 AM

Wow hottest MNF game in a while

CSL 10-17-2006 12:59 AM

CHOKEEEEE

RoXer 10-17-2006 12:59 AM

WOWW

RoXer 10-17-2006 12:59 AM

My heart is seriously going nuts

Jesus Shuttlesworth 10-17-2006 01:00 AM

Called it but I said wide right, not left

RoXer 10-17-2006 01:02 AM

NEILL RACKERS WOW WOW OMG

How do you turn it around in one year like that? GO BACK TO BEING NEIL RACKERS


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®