Undertaker's road to Wrestlemania kinda heelish
 

anyone else notice that Taker's road to WM seemed kinda heelish in that it seemed like everything was handed to him on a platter.

i mean, first he draws the Miz for the time limit challenge for a title shot.

then, he clears the ring in a Royal Rumble match, that he wasnt even in, that same night.

then, he draws # 30 in the Royal Rumble.

next, they'll probably make the WM match "Darkside Rules, playa!!!"

not that i want Batista to win.

just sayin'...

lol, Darkside rules and batista must wear a leg cast!

So not "defying the odds" is automatic heelness now?

Yeah cause faces have never interrupted a match that they weren't a part of before.

Well, if you've been watching WWE lately, yes.

But seriously, this is a pretty asinine deal. As retarded as the setup is, the thread is pretty retarded, too.

Side question, is Taker the first #30 to win the Rumble?

Yes

So, is Bats suppose to be the hell in this contest, or is it Taker? Also, why hasn't HHH been champion for the past couple of years?

Triple H is contractually obliged to spend at least 3 years per century not being champ. He chose to lump them together to get them out of the way

I was under the impression that both Bats and 'Taker were faces going into this.



Not extremely convincing faces, but... yeah.

It's like...They're TRYING to kill my interest.

yeah, they're both supposed to be faces. and yeah, this may have been a pointless thread. i just wanted to comment on how Taker's road to WM is something that would typically be handed to somebody like Triple H by a heel GM.

I expect BatistaBombed! to come in here any moment.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

:lol: did ya like that?

are you seriously rolling on the floor laughing right now? cuz so am i.

i'm not sitting in front of my computer with my pants around my ankles, typing lefty at all. :shifty:

. . .



CHAAAAAANGE PLACES