Batista or Cena
 

Batista or Cena

Whaaaaaaaaat about them? Who's better? Who's worse? Who's got the sexier body? Makes the best pork chops? Most likely to go Warrior? What?

Cena. Although they are both okay in the way that they can be carried to a good match. But I say Cena coz right now he looks determined enough to be a big time player. Batista seems more like a "I'm a big dude, I'm made for life" kinda guy.

Of course, I'm assuming that the question is "Who do you like most?"

Yeah, I'm gonna assume that, too. Cena it is.

Dave

It's interesting that Batista and Cena were neck and neck at the 2005 Royal Rumble but Batista went over Cena. Fast forward to WM21 Batista and Cena became champions.

Now look at this year's RR. Taker and HBK were neck and neck with Taker going over. Taker is obviously going to be new WHC. I'm predicting HBK will win also.

Just wanted to throw that out there. Batista looks stiff and it's hard for me to enjoy a match with him so I go with Cena just as long as he doesn't make those weird faces.

A battery acid bath.

As much as people like to criticise Cena, at least his matches are heat filled and exciting. Batista's just plain horrible.

Loose Cannon :shifty:

I haven't seen this heat or excitement in a long time. Hsi matches are about as entertaining as thumbs up/thumbs down.

I liked when Taker was in the ring then Batista came out and did the thumbs up/thumbs down thing. Then JBL said its gonna take more than 2 thumbs to beat the Undertaker. :lol:

Cena. Horrible gimmick aside, he's not all bad. Bats is just lazy as a porch monkey. (I use that term as Randel would, and not in a racial way)

Randal Graves > Cena > Bats

The Donkey > Randal Graves > Cena > Bats

So you're reclaiming it?

Cena has, at least, good in-ring skills when he's not the top boy. He's been a hard worker in the past, and CAN entertain. So I agree.

The only problem with Cena is not with him or his skill. I buy him as a main eventer, he can work the stick, he's got it, and he can at least work a match without blowing up. I'm sure Shawn can carry him to the best match of the night.
I'm fine with Cena as a main eventer and champion, but not as Superman. Theres no shame in holding the title for a few months at a time and working second main event fueds from time to time. It's called jobbing. The Rock and Stone Cold did it, even HHH did. Allow for supporting stars.


Batista is just horrendous. Everything about him is boring and mediocre. Not to mention he's given the same sickening overpush. So it's way worse.

Cena is booked as Hogan, and Hogan never loses. The worst art about that is that he's always the underdog...

But, you know, your main guy can never lose. Right Austin?

10 years from now, when they've FINALLY ran out of new ways to put Cena over, they'll just decide to have a "Whole Raw, Smackdown and ECW rosters VS John Cena" match.

Of course Hogan will though. :D

If you had asked me back before Batista got hurt, I'd have said Dave in a heart beat. The guy was just naturally charismatic, whereas Cena was "Johnny Forcedthroat". Now, I think Cena is the less irritating of the two, and a lot of that has to do with his future and the skill he does have, even if it never shows up in his matches.

I would rather take KoOS' suggestion of a battery acid bath, though. :y:

This is what this question is like...

There's two piles of horseshit laying on the grown and you are being forced to eat one of them, which one would you pick?

With that said, I picked Cena because he's the smaller pile of horseshit.

And in all honesty I think he is better than Batista in about every aspect.

Cena easily.

Cena's much better than Batista.

Batista Pyro > Cena No Pyro.

BTW Chris Sabin