TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Jericho drove Raw's rating through the roof! (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=71718)

KingofOldSchool 11-20-2007 10:44 PM

Jericho drove Raw's rating through the roof!
 
Well not really.

3.5 according to the Observer.

Xero 11-20-2007 10:45 PM

I've heard the real number was 2.22...

Inadequacy 11-20-2007 10:49 PM

I was afraid of sarcasm when I read the title, looks like I win again

KingofOldSchool 11-20-2007 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inadequacy (Post 1936978)
I was afraid of sarcasm when I read the title, looks like I win again

You win 12 intrawebs!

Inadequacy 11-20-2007 10:51 PM

sweet, that brings my grand total of intrawebs to...*calculates*
TWELVE!

Xero 11-20-2007 10:52 PM

Only 156,938 to go and you get a free tube!

Or a plastic spider ring. Your choice.

Kane Knight 11-20-2007 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KingofOldSchool (Post 1936973)
Well not really.

3.5 according to the Observer.

Yeah, this is the same number Boone was reporting, which means it's the usual, incorrect version. IT's also down from previous false reports.

Chris Jericho, Ratings Killer.

Last Week's Raw was down, BTW. 3.1 and 2.9 or less. Be interesting to see what happens with this week's ratings. Up in anticipation?

Inadequacy 11-20-2007 10:55 PM

I'm gonna have to go with the Spider ring, but only if it has to do with wheelchairboundspasticcripples

http://www.tpww.net/forums/showthread.php?t=71691
just in case you want clarification on my above statement

Savio 11-20-2007 11:37 PM

What is raw usually now?

Kane Knight 11-20-2007 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savior (Post 1937088)
What is raw usually now?

High 2's, with a couple of shows in the low 3's of late.

Kane Knight 11-20-2007 11:45 PM

Those are the real ratings, though, ones actually from NMR, not the ones the dirt sheets publish.

BigDaddyCool 11-20-2007 11:51 PM

So Jericho killed the ratings? Told you he sucks.

Kane Knight 11-20-2007 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 1937132)
So Jericho killed the ratings? Told you he sucks.

Naw. All the smarks who were bitching for weeks "WTF WWE WHERE IS JERICHO" Finally stopped watching.

BigDaddyCool 11-20-2007 11:55 PM

Good, glad. I want Jericho to fall flat on his face they way I said he would.

Kane Knight 11-21-2007 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 1937140)
Good, glad. I want Jericho to fall flat on his face they way I said he would.

For what it's worth, Jericho will likely have no impact whatsoever.

Dave Youell 11-21-2007 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight (Post 1937165)
For what it's worth, Jericho will likely have no impact whatsoever.

:-\

Well i guess this means there's basically no one who could/would comeback that can spike the ratings.

There's an outside chance next week might increase, but I doubt it

El Fangel 11-21-2007 09:25 AM

Save_Jericho.From+Cena

Loose Cannon 11-21-2007 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Youell (Post 1937312)
:-\

Well i guess this means there's basically no one who could/would comeback that can spike the ratings.

There's an outside chance next week might increase, but I doubt it

understand that wrestlers themselves do not spike ratings. When a wrestler comes back, sure you may see a spike for a few shows, but if the angles are lacking, it's going to come right back down. If the show is airing great TV and is consistent in doing show, you'll see those numbers spike.

Kane Knight 11-21-2007 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Youell (Post 1937312)
:-\

Well i guess this means there's basically no one who could/would comeback that can spike the ratings.

There's an outside chance next week might increase, but I doubt it

LOL You're an idiot.

Tommy Gunn 11-21-2007 12:58 PM

I think the ratings for Monday suck so much because WWE knew that people would watch for Jericho, so half-arsed the show and had fuckin' Bobcore main event.

Mr Regal 11-21-2007 02:46 PM

I think the ratings mainly suck because, relatively speaking, not that many people like wrestling.

BigDaddyCool 11-21-2007 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Regal (Post 1937555)
I think the ratings mainly suck because, relatively speaking, not that many people like wrestling.

Not that many people like wrestling because it is poorly written and the characters suck. Or at least that is what people think. And as of late, WWE has done very little to change this what with Vince and 'Swog eating up a quarter of the show.

Mr Regal 11-21-2007 02:55 PM

Carlito vs Horswoggle was not a good way to use TV time. People who write wrestling are morons. At what point will someone with power to change it actually realise this?

hb2k 11-21-2007 04:13 PM

We'll see what Jericho's impact was when the quarter hour breakdowns come out. If the entire show was up that wouldn't be because of Jericho either because he wasn't the thread of the evening, and the casuals, the majority, probably had no clue he was debuting regardless.

Kane Knight 11-21-2007 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Regal (Post 1937571)
Carlito vs Horswoggle was not a good way to use TV time. People who write wrestling are morons. At what point will someone with power to change it actually realise this?

The people with the power to change it got rid of all the writers and hired the current lot, commonly TV writers.

I don't think the writers are morons, so much as asskissers who are working for morons.

Kane Knight 11-21-2007 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hb2k (Post 1937619)
We'll see what Jericho's impact was when the quarter hour breakdowns come out. If the entire show was up that wouldn't be because of Jericho either because he wasn't the thread of the evening, and the casuals, the majority, probably had no clue he was debuting regardless.

Anyone have actual access to QHs?

The most we'll see is a surge in the overrun, because it's technically a new "hour" in all probability.

Anyway, I think it's pointless to argue casuals. At this point, a rating increase would likely be the people who have been recently turned off from wrestling, who would be clued in.

Rob 11-21-2007 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 1937140)
Good, glad. I want Jericho to fall flat on his face they way I said he would.

He'll still be a bigger draw than Kevin Nash.

#BROKEN Hasney 11-21-2007 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob (Post 1937752)
He'll still be a bigger draw than Kevin Nash.

No he won't, ask Kevin Nash. He'll tell you.

JT 11-21-2007 07:22 PM

Actually, the rating have only occasionally dipped into the 2.X range. They average 3.1-3.4 each week.

Also this weeks rating of 3.5 is the same as last weeks ratings of 3.5.

Kane Knight 11-21-2007 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JT Kool (Post 1937781)
Actually, the rating have only occasionally dipped into the 2.X range. They average 3.1-3.4 each week.

Also this weeks rating of 3.5 is the same as last weeks ratings of 3.5.

WRONG!

Kane Knight 11-21-2007 07:31 PM

Seriously though, every couple of months this comes along, and the problem is the ratings don't stack up to the ones listed in the dirt sheets. They're consistently inflated.

Last week's better hour was 3.1. There's no way they charted a 3.5 overall.

JT 11-21-2007 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight (Post 1937790)
Seriously though, every couple of months this comes along, and the problem is the ratings don't stack up to the ones listed in the dirt sheets. They're consistently inflated.

Last week's better hour was 3.1. There's no way they charted a 3.5 overall.

You may be right, but could you link me to where you're getting your info from?

EDIT: Okay, got 3.1 from zap2it.com...

Cable Series by Total Households
week of 11/05/07-11/11/07
Sort by Viewers
<table bgcolor="#ffffff" border="1" bordercolor="#336633" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tbody><tr><td class="tableheader" colspan="8" align="center">Top 15 Cable Series: Total Households
</td></tr><tr> <td class="tableheader" rowspan="2" align="center">Rank
</td> <td class="tableheader" rowspan="2">Program Name
</td> <td class="tableheader" rowspan="2" align="center">Net
</td> <td class="tableheader" rowspan="2" align="center">Day
</td> <td class="tableheader" rowspan="2" align="center">Time
</td> <td class="tableheader" colspan="2" align="center">Household
</td> <td class="tableheader" rowspan="2" align="center">Viewers
</td></tr><tr> <td class="tableheader" align="center">Rating
</td> <td class="tableheader" align="center">Audience
</td></tr><tr> <td align="center">1
</td> <td>NFL REGULAR SEASON L (RAVENS/STEELERS)
</td> <td>ESPN
</td> <td>MON
</td> <td align="right">8:30 PM
</td> <td align="right">6.5
</td> <td align="right">7,321,000
</td> <td align="right">9,887,000
</td></tr><tr> <td align="center">2
</td> <td>WWE ENTERTAINMENT (WWE RAW)
</td> <td>USA
</td> <td>MON
</td> <td align="right">10:00 PM
</td> <td align="right">3.3
</td> <td align="right">3,689,000
</td> <td align="right">5,267,000
</td></tr><tr> <td align="center">3
</td> <td>S HANNAH MONTANA(S)-11/10/2007
</td> <td>DSNY
</td> <td>SAT
</td> <td align="right">8:00 PM
</td> <td align="right">3.1
</td> <td align="right">3,537,000
</td> <td align="right">5,470,000
</td></tr><tr> <td align="center">4
</td> <td>WWE ENTERTAINMENT (WWE RAW)
</td> <td>USA
</td> <td>MON
</td> <td align="right">9:00 PM
</td> <td align="right">3.1
</td> <td align="right">3,521,000
</td> <td align="right">5,129,000
</td></tr><tr> <td align="center">5
</td> <td>SANTA CLAUSE, THE
</td> <td>DSNY
</td> <td>SUN
</td> <td align="right">8:00 PM
</td> <td align="right">3.0
</td> <td align="right">3,378,000
</td> <td align="right">5,097,000
</td></tr><tr> <td align="center">6
</td> <td>COLL FTBALL-SAT AFT L (MICHIGAN/WISONSIN)
</td> <td>ESPN
</td> <td>SAT
</td> <td align="right">12:01 PM
</td> <td align="right">3.0
</td> <td align="right">3,340,000
</td> <td align="right">4,402,000
</td></tr><tr> <td align="center">7
</td> <td>SPONGEBOB
</td> <td>NICK
</td> <td>SAT
</td> <td align="right">11:30 AM
</td> <td align="right">3.0
</td> <td align="right">3,334,000
</td> <td align="right">4,523,000
</td></tr><tr> <td align="center">8
</td> <td>S WIZARDS OF WAVERLY PLAC(S)-11/10/2007
</td> <td>DSNY
</td> <td>SAT
</td> <td align="right">8:30 PM
</td> <td align="right">2.7
</td> <td align="right">3,051,000
</td> <td align="right">4,597,000
</td></tr><tr> <td align="center">9
</td> <td>SPONGEBOB
</td> <td>NICK
</td> <td>SAT
</td> <td align="right">11:00 AM
</td> <td align="right">2.7
</td> <td align="right">3,033,000
</td> <td align="right">4,007,000
</td></tr><tr> <td align="center">10
</td> <td>SPONGEBOB
</td> <td>NICK
</td> <td>SAT
</td> <td align="right">12:00 PM
</td> <td align="right">2.6
</td> <td align="right">2,952,000
</td> <td align="right">3,861,000
</td></tr><tr> <td align="center">11
</td> <td>SPONGEBOB
</td> <td>NICK
</td> <td>SUN
</td> <td align="right">12:00 PM
</td> <td align="right">2.6
</td> <td align="right">2,945,000
</td> <td align="right">4,358,000
</td></tr><tr> <td align="center">12
</td> <td>SUITE LIFE OF ZACK & CODY
</td> <td>DSNY
</td> <td>SAT
</td> <td align="right">7:30 PM
</td> <td align="right">2.6
</td> <td align="right">2,933,000
</td> <td align="right">4,388,000
</td></tr><tr> <td align="center">13
</td> <td>SOUTH PARK
</td> <td>CMDY
</td> <td>WED
</td> <td align="right">10:00 PM
</td> <td align="right">2.6
</td> <td align="right">2,923,000
</td> <td align="right">3,967,000
</td></tr><tr> <td align="center">14
</td> <td>WIZARDS OF WAVERLY PLACE
</td> <td>DSNY
</td> <td>FRI
</td> <td align="right">8:30 PM
</td> <td align="right">2.5
</td> <td align="right">2,865,000
</td> <td align="right">4,013,000
</td></tr><tr> <td align="center">15
</td> <td>SPONGEBOB
</td> <td>NICK
</td> <td>SAT
</td> <td align="right">9:30 AM
</td> <td align="right">2.5
</td> <td align="right">2,853,000
</td> <td align="right">3,936,000
</td></tr></tbody></table>
Damn you and having to be right! :mad:

Kane Knight 11-21-2007 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JT Kool (Post 1937841)
You may be right, but could you link me to where you're getting your info from?

Nielsen Media Research. The guys who actually publish the ratings they use.

JT 11-21-2007 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight (Post 1937847)
Nielsen Media Research. The guys who actually publish the ratings they use.

You have a subscription to Nielsen? :?:

Kane Knight 11-21-2007 09:59 PM

No.

JT 11-21-2007 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight (Post 1937860)
No.

Then how are you getting your information directly for Nielsen? Do you work for a television company? Are you a reporter?

Kane Knight 11-21-2007 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JT Kool (Post 1937867)
Then how are you getting your information directly for Nielsen? Do you work for a television company? Are you a reporter?

I know how to work Google.

Though I am a reporter. I wonder if I could actually sign for that.

JT 11-21-2007 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight (Post 1937872)
I know how to work Google.

Though I am a reporter. I wonder if I could actually sign for that.

Okay, was nitpicking because I thought you needed membership with Nielsen to get info from them. Just ran across the television section now though. >_>

Oh, and saw something about a reporter signup when looking about how to become a member. Didn't really check further than that thought.

YOUR Hero 11-21-2007 10:40 PM

Christian and Jericho would = some great back and forth verbage.

Kane Knight 11-21-2007 10:43 PM

Yeah, I wonder if I could bullshit it. I don't really report entertainment shit, but as a freelancer, I technically COULD. So I was kind of wondering.

So yeah. WWE is usually top ten programming. And NMR usually shows the top ten. Even when the top ten doesn't have WWE on it, you can debunk the scores, because they're often higher than top ten programs.

It's funny how that works.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®