TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   How credible is the IC belt right now? (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=72815)

Jeritron 12-17-2007 04:16 PM

How credible is the IC belt right now?
 
Seriously, for the past two years we have mostly agreed upon the failing prestige of the IC gold and how it's no longer as credible as it once was.

But look at it now. For the past year Jeff Hardy has brought some serious credibility to it with some lengthy reigns, and as a fighting champion weekly. Also, being one of the top faces on Raw hasn't hurt either, as he gets the pop of the night and steals the crowd just about every week.

And if his reigns, popularity, and match quality/frequency hasn't been good enough, the fact that he's on a roll and a half lately is HUGE. He's the IC champion and he's been going nuts lately, he just went over HHH, arguably the top name in the company..CLEAN. Now he's facing the WWE champion presumably while IC champion.

The IC belt right now might be the most credible belt going. I mean, he's been picking up cleaner wins over more credible stars than Orton or Edge. In a kayfabe sense, he might be the top ranking belt. I noticed in the Power 25 he was ranked #2 (not that that means anything but it indicates how he's been being pushed on the brand).

So what do you think? Best IC champion in a long long time. In fact, with him as #1 contender for the title he might be the most prominent IC champ since...who's the last person to do that, Warrior??

Jordan 12-17-2007 04:17 PM

Jeff Hardy and Umaga brought it up to its potential I think. I hope Jeff faces off at WM vs Edge in a Title for Title match, maybe even a ladder match.

Stickman 12-17-2007 04:19 PM

Before I read this thread I had to think of who the IC champ was.

Jeritron 12-17-2007 04:20 PM

Well aside from the opinions I put forth in that post, I think he's ABSOLUTELY the best IC champ since 04. More accurately, he's likely the best IC champ since 2000 or 1998 (Jericho, Angle, The Rock)

He's certainly the best in a long time

Jeritron 12-17-2007 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stickman (Post 1969960)
Before I read this thread I had to think of who the IC champ was.

That's clearly your fault.

BigDaddyCool 12-17-2007 04:20 PM

I think both the IC and US titles are the most credible they have been in years. They are more credible than the TNA title that is for sure.

addy2hotty 12-17-2007 04:26 PM

Was only a couple of months ago that certain people were saying that the belt had no real credibility and required a Mr Kennedy run to bring it back to a decent level. Jeff Hardy was champion then as well. I think the quote was 'the belt NEEDS Mr Kennedy right now'.

My goodness, how things change. Or is that stay the same?

BigDaddyCool 12-17-2007 04:27 PM

I never said it needed Mr. Kennedy.

BigDaddyCool 12-17-2007 04:27 PM

I did say Mr. Kennedy needs more time with an IC level title before being in the mainevent.

addy2hotty 12-17-2007 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 1969979)
I never said it needed Mr. Kennedy.

I wasn't referring to you BDC.

Theo Dious 12-17-2007 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordan X (Post 1969957)
Jeff Hardy and Umaga brought it up to its potential I think.

A year ago I'd have called you an idiot for saying that. But... fuck, it's true.

Theo Dious 12-17-2007 04:36 PM

Kennedy needs the IC title right now. The title does not need Kennedy.

Jeritron 12-17-2007 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarthTedious (Post 1970000)
Kennedy needs the IC title right now. The title does not need Kennedy.

Kennedy would be a good IC champ. Back when he was hot as hell after the MITB and the draft to Raw I felt that the IC belt was just okay, and that it could have benefited from Kennedy just as much as Kennedy could have benefited from it.

Now, he's tailed off but I think Kennedy woul still be a good choice. Jeff's a great champion tho

Nark Order 12-17-2007 05:09 PM

Jeff Hardy has really stepped up with his in-ring work since his return and especially since he got the IC title. He's definitely got a specific type of charisma to him that isn't identifiable to too many people. I feel that his offense in the ring is a bit too all over the place at times though. He'll need some work before he can be expected to carry a company. His pairing with the IC title has indeed not only helped him but it has helped the credibility of the belt itself. Part of this is in part to Umaga as well though. Who would've thought that Hardy and Umaga would compliment each other's styles so well in matches?

Kane Knight 12-17-2007 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stickman (Post 1969960)
Before I read this thread I had to think of who the IC champ was.


KYR 12-17-2007 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarthTedious (Post 1970000)
Kennedy needs the IC title right now. The title does not need Kennedy.

I think Darth's comment just about sums this up.

"Kennedy needs the IC title". If the IC title had NO credibility then NO ONE would need it. Obviously, if we feel that someone needs this title, we have a new-found respect for it.

Recently, some posters have suggested to bring back past titles e.g. Hardcore, European etc. If they did this, it would only water-down the value of the mid-level titles and reduce their credibility.

IC and US titles are clawing their way back up the respectability ladder, lets not send them crashing back down.

Londoner 12-17-2007 06:11 PM

Now that jeff is going to challenge for the wwe title, imo that lifts the credibility of the ic title since he's champ, and if they continue to book the ic title this way in future , then that can only be good.

Bad Company 12-17-2007 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stickman (Post 1969960)
Before I read this thread I had to think of who the IC champ was.

</>

DrA 12-17-2007 06:47 PM

I always thought that the IC title should be held by guys that you thought had a chance to be WWF champion eventually as well. When guys like The Rock, Triple H, Ken Shamrock, Kurt Angle, Chris Benoit, Chris Jericho, and a few years before that with Razor Ramon, Bret Hart, Shawn Michaels, etc, had the IC belt, they had the feel of a main eventer, even though I guess they were technically in the upper mid card.

That being said, it seems recently as the belt had become merely a stepping stone for the WWE title instead of a credible belt on its own. Want to make Randy Orton a main eventer? Just strap the IC title around him for a while until he gets the feel of a main eventer. Eventually the prestige of the title wore off with that sort of thinking. Guys like Umaga and Jeff Hardy, as of late, have kept the title reasonably close to the main event scene, rather than giving the belt to someone like Paul London, who would defend the title on Sunday Night Heat.

The problem with RAW right now is that there plainly just are not enough wrestlers on the roster to stabilize an upper mid card, meaning it's hard to maintain consistent credibility to the IC belt at this point in time. I'm trying not to get the roster split involved in this, but it's hard not to when trying to contemplate an issue like this.

Stickman 12-17-2007 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrA (Post 1970142)
I always thought that the IC title should be held by guys that you thought had a chance to be WWF champion eventually as well. When guys like The Rock, Triple H, Ken Shamrock, Kurt Angle, Chris Benoit, Chris Jericho, and a few years before that with Razor Ramon, Bret Hart, Shawn Michaels, etc, had the IC belt, they had the feel of a main eventer, even though I guess they were technically in the upper mid card.

That being said, it seems recently as the belt had become merely a stepping stone for the WWE title instead of a credible belt on its own. Want to make Randy Orton a main eventer? Just strap the IC title around him for a while until he gets the feel of a main eventer. Eventually the prestige of the title wore off with that sort of thinking. Guys like Umaga and Jeff Hardy, as of late, have kept the title reasonably close to the main event scene, rather than giving the belt to someone like Paul London, who would defend the title on Sunday Night Heat.

The problem with RAW right now is that there plainly just are not enough wrestlers on the roster to stabilize an upper mid card, meaning it's hard to maintain consistent credibility to the IC belt at this point in time. I'm trying not to get the roster split involved in this, but it's hard not to when trying to contemplate an issue like this.

Good point. :y:

Londoner 12-17-2007 07:13 PM

The problem with RAW right now is that there plainly just are not enough wrestlers on the roster to stabilize an upper mid card, meaning it's hard to maintain consistent credibility to the IC belt at this point in time. I'm trying not to get the roster split involved in this, but it's hard not to when trying to contemplate an issue like this.

You're right about it being the fault of the roster split, its just not the same when the company is split int wo.

St. Jimmy 12-17-2007 07:59 PM

Kennedy could carry the IC Strap into a massive fued and make it look like it's bigger than any world title.

The One 12-17-2007 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by St. Jimmy (Post 1970229)
Kennedy could carry the IC Strap into a massive fued and make it look like it's bigger than any world title.

You are incorrect.

El Fangel 12-17-2007 11:07 PM

As I said before, the IC Championship should also be on the line during MITB. It would also give the chance to Unify the IC and World/WWE Titles, which I believe has never been done.

Jeritron 12-17-2007 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fallen Angel (Post 1970973)
As I said before, the IC Championship should also be on the line during MITB. It would also give the chance to Unify the IC and World/WWE Titles, which I believe has never been done.

If you mean someone holding the IC and WWE title at the same time, Warrior did that. I think that's all tho

El Fangel 12-17-2007 11:14 PM

I forgot about that.

And then he went crazy.

If Jeff did would there be a change?

Jeritron 12-17-2007 11:17 PM

You know, I hope Jeff does it. But realistically they'll probably have him lose the IC title right before, or right after (if indeed he does win the WWE title, and happens to be IC champ at the time)

Jeritron 12-17-2007 11:17 PM

Jeff will be a grand slam champion btw. I believe....he was european champ right?

Xero 12-17-2007 11:18 PM

Got to love Jeff didn't have the title on when he came down for his promo tonight. Clearly it's EXTREMELY important.

El Fangel 12-17-2007 11:18 PM

I think he was, matt was I know. He also was LHW champ too.

Yeah he was the last Euro champ.

Jeritron 12-17-2007 11:20 PM

Yea I just checked. He's been IC, Tag, European, LightHeavyweight, Hardcore champion. If he wins he WWE title he's won all their in house titles ever offered, except womens.
Of course they've had the US and Cruiserweight titles, and the World. But they're the WCW belts.

Xero 12-17-2007 11:23 PM

Grand Slam Champions, as far as I'm concerned, can ONLY be considered as such for holding the WWE, IC, Euro and Tag champions.

Anything else is just four titles because, at this point, there are 9 titles in WWE and they get whored around like Lita at her goodbye party.

El Fangel 12-17-2007 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xero Limit 125
Anything else is just four titles because, at this point, there are 9 titles in WWE and they get whored around like Lita at her goodbye party.

That may be an over-statement, as most of the past year, the WWE Title was on Cena.

Lets say that title period, was Edges turn at the party.

thedamndest 12-18-2007 12:42 AM

When Warrior won the WWF(E) Championship he had to vacate the IC belt. When HHH beat Kane it unified the titles. I think the former is more likely if Jeff does win at the Rumble, though doing so would invoke a mention of the Warrior so he will probably just drop it first.

El Fangel 12-18-2007 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thedamndest (Post 1971046)
When HHH beat Kane it unified the titles.

When was this, I forget.

thedamndest 12-18-2007 12:50 AM

No Mercy 2002.

Jeritron 12-18-2007 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xero Limit 126 (Post 1970996)
Grand Slam Champions, as far as I'm concerned, can ONLY be considered as such for holding the WWE, IC, Euro and Tag champions.

Anything else is just four titles because, at this point, there are 9 titles in WWE and they get whored around like Lita at her goodbye party.

Well that would include Jeff if he ever wins the WWE belt. That also includes HBK, HHH, Jericho, Angle, Eddie Guerrero and RVD. By that criteria, those are the grandlsam champions.
The only other person to be a grandslam champion technically is JBL, although I don't consider him one because I agree with you about the criteria.

Mr. Nerfect 12-18-2007 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xero Limit 126 (Post 1970988)
Got to love Jeff didn't have the title on when he came down for his promo tonight. Clearly it's EXTREMELY important.

See, this is it. Sure, Jeff Hardy has, to my surprise, become something quite good recently, but what good is being the IC Champion is the WWE pretends the belt doesn't even exist.

Honestly, I hope a heel costs Jeff Hardy his match at the Royal Rumble, and does so because Jeff is making the IC Title look like crap. I don't care if it's Carlito, DH Smith or Charlie fucking Haas. There needs to be a wake-up call to Jeff being IC Champion.

To be honest, I'd love for Randy Orton to up the ante in their Royal Rumble match, and request that the IC Title be on the line. Fuck, if the WWE truly cared about the belt, they'd have had it on the line during the match at Armageddon. What the WWE was basically suggesting there, was that being in the WWE Title division is more important than being IC Champion. It creates the impression that there is a huge field between being WWE Champion and being IC Champion, when really, the WWE would be best served to making the IC Title look like a silver medal.

Jeritron 12-18-2007 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alienoid06 (Post 1971232)
See, this is it. Sure, Jeff Hardy has, to my surprise, become something quite good recently, but what good is being the IC Champion is the WWE pretends the belt doesn't even exist.

Honestly, I hope a heel costs Jeff Hardy his match at the Royal Rumble, and does so because Jeff is making the IC Title look like crap. I don't care if it's Carlito, DH Smith or Charlie fucking Haas. There needs to be a wake-up call to Jeff being IC Champion.

To be honest, I'd love for Randy Orton to up the ante in their Royal Rumble match, and request that the IC Title be on the line. Fuck, if the WWE truly cared about the belt, they'd have had it on the line during the match at Armageddon. What the WWE was basically suggesting there, was that being in the WWE Title division is more important than being IC Champion. It creates the impression that there is a huge field between being WWE Champion and being IC Champion, when really, the WWE would be best served to making the IC Title look like a silver medal.


You may actually be getting more absurd.

BigDaddyCool 12-18-2007 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by addy2hotty (Post 1969983)
I wasn't referring to you BDC.

Bullshit, everything refers to me. :mad:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®