I don't watch much TNA, but I gotta know...
 

How many times has Angle injured himself since going there?

It feels like every week I hear about his "injury" or "concussion". I've just watched a video of him gashing his head open on Wrestlinggonewrong.com.

Maybe going to TNA wasn't such a great idea.

But he's an Olympian!

I believe he has only been injured twice since joining TNA.


And how would this make going to TNA a bad idea? Guys get hurt in the WWE all the time, and they have to work three times the dates and travel ten times as much, which is naturally harder on the body.

Or is this simply the "omgz TNA is stupidz" mentality?

Actually it's neither.

It just appears like Angles ALWAYS hurting himself in TNA. Maybe he isn't, but I'm fairly sure there's always headlines on here saying about his "serious injury" and his "latest concussion".

Also, calm down. :foc:

Who won with a borken freakin' neck. NEVER FORGET THIS.

Define injury? He hasn't laft the major roster yet, so I'd say none. Bumps and bruises for the most part. Rare concussion. Just like everyone else really.

The one on wrestlinggonewrong.com where he gashes his head open is pretty bad, but he always does that thing where he twitches his hand etc... Kinda scary to be honest.

42

And thats just before Lunch :eek:

Ahh, Fox and his "let's spazz everything out of proportion" mentality.

If it seems like Kurt's still getting injured, which was what Meester Mad thought, though working a third and travelling a tenth, wouldn't it be a bad idea?

What was a better alternative then? Seriously, I'm asking for your opinion on this.

WWE fired him. He wasn't getting hired back. Even if he did, he stands more chance being hurt there since they work more dates and more impact matches on top.

UFC offered him a huge deal. Could have been hurt seriously fighting too.

Retirement - Couldn't afford to do it. Hasn't saved enough of his money to quit.

He could work in a supermarket. :shifty:

"I scanned 72 IPH....WITH A BROKEN FREAKIN' NECK! WOOOOOOOO!"

Anyway, while Rob is right, it's a "Smark Fact" that Kurt left WWE, not vice versa. Therefore, he's wrong under the Retcon act of 1997.