![]() |
Dolph Ziggler
Did I actually find him entertaining against Batista?
|
I know I did. He got in a surprising amount of offense and there was a faint "Ziggler" chant going.
|
Yes, that might've been it. I enjoyed him too.
Also, it's good to be back. |
What surprised me the most was that he got a reaction. Now I can't wait to see him in the ring next week on Raw. I just hope he doesn't squash someone. Squash matches are meant for boring hosses. I guess I should hope D'Lo has the night off.
|
I liked him also tbh, surprisingly!
|
From what I've seen I like his style. His elbow drop to Batista was pretty sweet and reminded me of WCW, vs nWo Revenge. I wonder how he can carry himself in a nice lengthy match
<div><object width="480" height="285"><param name="movie" value="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/k7b72xDPPbTp9ERtXL&related=1&canvas=medium"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/k7b72xDPPbTp9ERtXL&related=1&canvas=medium" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="285" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always"></embed></object><br /><b><a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7l7b9_raw-120108-batista-vs-dolph-ziggler_sport">RAW 12/01/08 - Batista vs Dolph Ziggler</a></b><br /><i>Uploaded by <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/BuuPetit">BuuPetit</a></i></div> |
Yeah, that kick he delivered from the outside was pretty sweet looking.
|
Nice little match there. Also gotta dig his greasy 1991 WCW mullet.
|
Quote:
|
He was actually decent, wasn't he is Spirt Squad?
|
Yup, NICKY!
|
I cannot stand Dancin' Dave anymore.....
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yeah. Actually gotten worse lately. My friends a Bats mark, and I cannot for the life of me understand why. |
During his Evolution run and his the start of his face turn I was a Dancin' Dave Mark. But now he does his little interptive dance on the way to the ring, his ring work is mid card at best, and I swear to christ that Abe "Knuckleball" Schwartz is a better promo than him.
|
Quote:
|
Actually, you're completely right.
|
|
Kind of reminded me of Curt Henning
|
I really enjoyed Dolph Ziggler on RAW. Maybe it's because the horrible name and the suspension made me completely lose interest in the very talented Nick Nemeth, but he just completely took me by surprise.
Is there some sort of heat on Batista? Between losing the World Heavyweight Championship as fast as he did, having his team lose to Team Orton, almost being an afterthought in main event happenings and almost getting pushed to the limit by Ziggler, I'm wondering if Batista and Brian Kendrick light it up together backstage at PPVs. Anyway, the cheesy name, the nice guy attitude quickly spoiled by disrespect -- these are becoming charms and quirks that I could find myself liking. Dolph Ziggler for future Intercontinental Champion? I certainly hope so. |
This Ziggler gimmick is quite impressive thus far, I just hope they don't drop the ball with it like they did so many other chances.
|
This is the first time in a while I've actually marked out for a guy -- even mildly. It just doesn't happen much anymore. If they can keep it up, more power to them.
One thing Ziggler does well, is draw heat. He's actually yet to do anything heelish since debuting. He stood with the heels in the Lumberjack Match between Randy Orton and CM Punk, I believe, but besides that, he's just introduced himself. Granted, they were in Batista's hometown, but it wasn't just nothing for Ziggler, it was good heat. And a few "Ziggler" chants coming from the audience. |
Quote:
BTW, I have no problem with Dolph Ziggler. In fact him going around and introducing himself is an angle i thought could work back in the day. I hope he doesn't violate the wellness program again. |
Wow, my first post i can make in about 2 weeks. But that actually wasn't too bad of a match. I fully expected Dolph to be squashed in about a minute match if that. But that was fairly entertaining. Maybe Dolph can make some noise.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The last guy I marked out for was probably The Brian Kendrick. |
Yeah, and what happened to the Brian Kendrick? A lot of nothing. Have you not learned, you liking someone is the kiss of death.
|
Quote:
|
No, Kendrick's career is over. Also Jericho won the ic title only because they had to pull it off of Jeff Hardy. That and jericho's second title run this year was only so they could take it off batista without having him job to cena, thus allowing them to set up "cena bats 2: this time its for the title" at mania.
|
Oh, almost forgot, Jericho's first world title run only came about because of some lame duck booking, and it completely sucked as well.
|
Quote:
|
Ziggler is ok, from that one match. I'll want to see more like it before saying he is going to be great.
|
Quote:
Jericho's first run this year seemed like it was a reward for his great work. Just a week prior you heard reports of how Vince McMahon was really digging Jericho's work. I don't buy the second reign story. Batista held the World Heavyweight Title 8 days. The WWE had already been advertising Cena for Armageddon. Batista has also been made to look pretty...well, unspectacular in recent weeks. Losing to Team Orton (when really, Batista's team seemed like the logical choice as winners). Not to mention Cody Rhodes, Manu and Dolph Ziggler all getting in way more offense on Dave than would normally be expected of them. He also only got a lukewarm pop when he came out on RAW with the World Heavyweight Title. I think there are a number of factors contributing to Big Dave losing the belt. Besides, regardless of what spin you put on them, they are World Title reigns. And each has a flip story that has just as much evidence supporting it. So, in other words, you just need to shut the fuck up because you don't really know. Quote:
|
It's good to see him DO something.
|
Dolph, I mean. Not Batista.
|
Quote:
Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. Noid post. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Oh, and now noid will porbably claim that antognist are ganging up on him, or that I'm being some sort of hypocite. He will claim this because I just put words into his mouth completely ignoring the "probably." |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sorry, I didn't realise you had changed the point of discussion. Easy mistake to make seeing as their was no indicator of such. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®