TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   What counts in wrestling, i.e. what is Canon? (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=86763)

BigDaddyCool 01-27-2009 01:29 PM

What counts in wrestling, i.e. what is Canon?
 
So I was discussing with Kane Knight about how there seems to be a few ways to look at what counts story line wise and what doesn't. This comes from Noid saying Swagger cut a promo a while ago against Tommy Dreamer on ECW which explains Swaggers character and stuff like that.

Now to me, it seems like Noid (and a lot of others like him) count every little thing that happens on WWE tv, WWE.com, and possibly some radio spots as actually happening. Which reminds me of the way Russo would book, if you didn't watch everything, read everything, and just stay completely in the loop, you would miss key parts of storylines.

While I understand where this mindset is coming from, I disagree that simply because something happened, doesn't mean it is important. In my eyes, the only things that count are things that happen or are mentioned on Raw, Smackdown, PPV, or Impact! in TNA's case. What happens on ECW, House Shows, or the Website doesn't count unless it is mentioned later on Raw, Smackdown, Impact! or a PPV.

Now some of you will easily agree house shows and the website easily doesn't count, but why ECW? Well because ECW is an after thought of a show that is a glorified house show. This isn't a knock against ECW, it just doesn't count unless WWE says it counts on a mainshow. I mean seriously, when is the last time ECW was recapped on Smackdown or Raw if it didn't have to to with a Smackdown or Raw title or superstar?

Anyhow, discuss.

Hanso Amore 01-27-2009 02:28 PM

Nothing is Canon, because in a few years they will just do something to change what happened.

BigDaddyCool 01-27-2009 02:42 PM

I forgot to mention that after 6 months to a year, if they don't bring it up, it doesn't count anymore. I think the only thing that still counts is like Piper cracking Snuka in the head with a coconut and Untertaker's streak at Mania. Everything else is uncertain until they decide to bring it up again.

Hanso Amore 01-27-2009 02:50 PM

Correct.

Also, you forgot Hogan slamming Andre.

BigDaddyCool 01-27-2009 03:16 PM

No, that is only Hogan Canon. WWE hasn't mentioned this for a few years, therefore we can't be sure this happened.

Juan 01-27-2009 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2413387)
I mean seriously, when is the last time ECW was recapped on Smackdown or Raw if it didn't have to to with a Smackdown or Raw title or superstar?

Last week.

BigDaddyCool 01-27-2009 03:21 PM

Shut up Juan.

#BROKEN Hasney 01-27-2009 03:21 PM

Was the recap involving Matt Hardy? If it was, i wouldn't count that as they were about to do a massive SWWWEEERRRVVVVEEE the week after.

I bet Matts not on ECW until after WM now.

RatedGSuperstar 01-27-2009 03:23 PM

Off the top of my head, I can remember Shane confirming that Kane once tombstoned Linda and hooked a car battery up to his testicles, and that was probably about 5 years ago now. That was still when Adamle was GM, but they still talk about him being GM so I guess that still happened.

Eric Bischoff was never GM of Raw, though...they haven't mentioned that recently.

McLegend 01-27-2009 03:32 PM

Shane McMahon is the biggest threat to any wrestler ever.

BigDaddyCool 01-27-2009 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hasney (Post 2413517)
Was the recap involving Matt Hardy? If it was, i wouldn't count that as they were about to do a massive SWWWEEERRRVVVVEEE the week after.

I bet Matts not on ECW until after WM now.

Verily. Also Miz, Morrison, and Matt Hardy are canon, but if the rest of ECW doesn't count unless mentioned on Raw or Smackdown.

Juan 01-27-2009 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2413556)
Verily. Also Miz, Morrison, and Matt Hardy are canon, but if the rest of ECW doesn't count unless mentioned on Raw or Smackdown.

I really don't understand this kind of mentality. Yeah, ECW is the least watched show, but that's WWE's fault. Also, you're argument troubles me because almost nothing that happens on Smackdown ever gets mentioned on Raw.

Juan 01-27-2009 03:41 PM

ECW gets mentioned on Smackdown, Raw gets mentioned on ECW and Smackdown, but neither ECW or Smackdown get mentioned on RAW.

Hanso Amore 01-27-2009 03:43 PM

No one seems to remember that Shane used to be Vince's arch enemy, and now he is so angered by an attack on Vince that he is in tears before beating their top guy down.

BigDaddyCool 01-27-2009 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juan (Post 2413567)
ECW gets mentioned on Smackdown, Raw gets mentioned on ECW and Smackdown, but neither ECW or Smackdown get mentioned on RAW.

Yeah, Raw and Smackdown are canon.

Jeritron 01-27-2009 04:13 PM

This is absurd.

BigDaddyCool 01-27-2009 04:14 PM

At least I'm trying.

Kane Knight 01-27-2009 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juan (Post 2413564)
I really don't understand this kind of mentality. Yeah, ECW is the least watched show, but that's WWE's fault. Also, you're argument troubles me because almost nothing that happens on Smackdown ever gets mentioned on Raw.

Just an aside, how is it WWE's fault? People on here keep saying it's the best written, best booked, etc., of WWE's programs, so where's the problem, aside from it being on a network even Trekkies on marginally care about?

Anyway, it's not about being the least watched show. ECW is essentially Velocity/Heat and is treated with roughly the same level of "continuity" within the WWE "universe." I wouldn't be surprised to find they'd retuned wrestlers like they did with Velocity/Heat, either (Misterrrrrrrrr...ANDERSON!).

WWE ignores a lot that happens even on their flagship show, but that's at least kept as an integral part of the loops. It's no stretch to say "ECW; doesn't count."

Anybody Thrilla 01-27-2009 10:21 PM

It is definitely a stretch to say ECW doesn't count. For the record, they recapped ECW on SmackDOWN! when Swagger won the title just a few weeks ago. Anything televised counts. Seems pretty simple, really.

Kane Knight 01-28-2009 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anybody Thrilla (Post 2414298)
It is definitely a stretch to say ECW doesn't count. For the record, they recapped ECW on SmackDOWN! when Swagger won the title just a few weeks ago. Anything televised counts. Seems pretty simple, really.

We both know that's not true.

Anybody Thrilla 01-28-2009 11:40 AM

ECW counts, god damn it.

Fox 01-28-2009 11:46 AM

This thread is retarded. That is all.

Anybody Thrilla 01-28-2009 11:54 AM

Also, how is calling ECW a 'glorified house show' not a knock on ECW? Just because you don't like ECW is no reason to say it doesn't count. It has its own roster, general manager, and champion. It counts, and you'd be absolutely silly to assume anything otherwise.

If ECW was NEVER mentioned outside of its own show, it's superstars weren't advertised as ECW superstars, and their title was never defended on PPV (it was even defended on RAW before when Kenny Dykstra challenged Bobby Lashley), then you MAY have a point. But none of those things happen.

House shows don't count unless mentioned. That's true. Same for the internet...but to put ECW in that category is...well, stupid, really.

Fox 01-28-2009 11:57 AM

Okay, ECW counts, but it's still pretty much a glorified VelociHeat. And it sucks, because that ECW Title is taking up card-room that should be given to the IC and US belts.

Anybody Thrilla 01-28-2009 12:03 PM

Were you saying that when the ECW title matches were CM Punk versus Elijah Burke or John Morrison? Even Hardy versus Swagger is a good match to me. Just because that title is on the card doesn't mean it's going to be a shitty match, and it also doesn't mean that something better would have replaced it. Maybe a Khali Kiss Cam or something.

BigDaddyCool 01-28-2009 12:14 PM

Which part of I like ECW but it is a developement territory don't you understand?

Kane Knight 01-28-2009 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anybody Thrilla (Post 2414842)
Were you saying that when the ECW title matches were CM Punk versus Elijah Burke or John Morrison? Even Hardy versus Swagger is a good match to me. Just because that title is on the card doesn't mean it's going to be a shitty match, and it also doesn't mean that something better would have replaced it. Maybe a Khali Kiss Cam or something.


And just because you go out of you way to fellate* everything doesn't lend validity to either the quality or status of the show or matches. It's not about quality, but treatment. Come now.

*You're the one who preaches it, brotha, not me.

Kane Knight 01-28-2009 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2414852)
Which part of I like ECW but it is a developement territory don't you understand?

The part that mandates an understanding of a line of thought that is not binary.

Anybody Thrilla 01-28-2009 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight (Post 2414855)
And just because you go out of you way to fellate* everything doesn't lend validity to either the quality or status of the show or matches. It's not about quality, but treatment. Come now.

*You're the one who preaches it, brotha, not me.

I'm not going out of my way at all here. ECW counts. Is that really such a ridiculous thing to say? You're not even quoting the post where I gave my reasons as to why. I agree, it's not about quality. But they DO acknowledge that it exists and that its results ACTUALLY HAPPENED.

Anybody Thrilla 01-28-2009 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2414852)
Which part of I like ECW but it is a developement territory don't you understand?

I don't recall you saying you like ECW, nor does that matter. It still counts.

BigDaddyCool 01-28-2009 12:52 PM

I've said I like it many times. I just don't watch it because I have other things to do that watch wrestling all the time.

Anybody Thrilla 01-28-2009 12:53 PM

DVR

Kane Knight 01-28-2009 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anybody Thrilla (Post 2414874)
I'm not going out of my way at all here. ECW counts. Is that really such a ridiculous thing to say? You're not even quoting the post where I gave my reasons as to why. I agree, it's not about quality. But they DO acknowledge that it exists and that its results ACTUALLY HAPPENED.

In the same sense they've acknowledged what happened on the web, house shows, and Heat/Velocity. You know, it counts when it's convenient.

Jeritron 01-28-2009 01:05 PM

Not really. It's part of PPVs and interpromotional storylines. This is really a pointless argument.

Juan 01-28-2009 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeritron (Post 2414965)
Not really. It's part of PPVs and interpromotional storylines. This is really a pointless argument.

Thank you.

parkmania 01-28-2009 07:04 PM

I STILL REMEMBER!

BigDaddyCool 01-28-2009 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parkmania (Post 2415494)
I STILL REMEMBER!

No you don't

Kane Knight 01-28-2009 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2415739)
No you don't

Because it's not canon.

BigDaddyCool 01-28-2009 10:23 PM

Exactly, thank you.

parkmania 01-29-2009 03:06 PM

Oh, yeah. I forgot.


G TV? Never heard of it.





IT'S STILL REAL TO ME DAMMIT!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®