TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   This is either a good idea or a bad one... (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=87111)

Vastardikai 02-04-2009 10:00 PM

This is either a good idea or a bad one...
 
Anyway, I had this idea, based on ROH's Pure Title.

I was going to call it the Catch Division. The premise is No DQ, No Countout, No Weapons. The match can be ended only by Pinfall, Submission, or KO.

The concept is a more MMA-based division. It will give props to the best wrestlers, but enough of a rub for Brawlers to get ahead, as well.

Comments, disses.

Executioner 02-04-2009 10:07 PM

not bad...just makes me miss the Pure title in ROH

Xero 02-04-2009 10:19 PM

But if there are no DQs and the match can only end with a Pinfall, Submission or KO, what happens if they use weapons?

Vastardikai 02-04-2009 10:23 PM

I probably hadn't fleshed the whole thing out yet. I was probably gonna have to add a "No Leaving the Ring" rule.

Xero 02-04-2009 10:24 PM

So what happens if they leave the ring?

:shifty:

Kane Knight 02-04-2009 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xero (Post 2424445)
So what happens if they leave the ring?

:shifty:

DQ. ;)

Vastardikai 02-04-2009 10:30 PM

God Damn it, you're making this too complicated.

:mad:




:shifty:

Xero 02-04-2009 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vastardikai (Post 2424471)
God Damn it, you're making this too complicated.

:mad:

That's what everyone tells Vince Russo but it doesn't stop him.

Mr. Nerfect 02-04-2009 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xero (Post 2424437)
But if there are no DQs and the match can only end with a Pinfall, Submission or KO, what happens if they use weapons?

They'd be disqualified. By "No DQ" I'm sure Vastardikai meant that there are no holds barred. You're allowed to use closed fists to the face, your toes to kick, chokes, etc. There would be no rope breaks to ease the pace of a match.

It'd be like one of Ring of Honor's "Fights Without Honor," only, well...with honor.

Xero 02-04-2009 11:11 PM

Yeah, no shit.

Mr. Nerfect 02-04-2009 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xero (Post 2424544)
Yeah, no shit.

Then stop wasting the guy's time by asking him questions you already know the answer to.

Xero 02-04-2009 11:20 PM

No.

Hey Vas, if there's no exiting the ring, how can there be no countouts?

Juan 02-04-2009 11:25 PM

lol

KYR 02-04-2009 11:26 PM

:lol:

Looks like the needle's pointing towards the latter part of the title.

COME ON SON...bring it home, Vas.

Mr. Nerfect 02-04-2009 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xero (Post 2424574)
No.

Hey Vas, if there's no exiting the ring, how can there be no countouts?

Because, if you cannot leave the ring, then there is no possible way to be counted out. Hence, no countouts. :roll:

Xero 02-04-2009 11:38 PM

Then why make it a rule in the first place?

Mr. Nerfect 02-04-2009 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xero (Post 2424599)
Then why make it a rule in the first place?

It's not a rule. It's a premise.

Kane Knight 02-05-2009 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noid (Post 2424569)
Then stop wasting the guy's time by asking him questions you already know the answer to.

Take a joke for once.

Vastardikai 02-05-2009 12:42 AM

I was gonna go with ropebreaks. Maybe something similar to Pure Rules in that respect with a limited number. If someone falls out of the ring on accident, all action stops and the guy has to get back into the ring. If he refuses or is unable, its considered a TKO. Not necessarily a 10 or 20 count but a "Get in the Ring right now or the match is over" type of warning. Kind of a semantics thing, I know.

I was considering the "no exiting the ring" thing more as a way to prevent stalling and eliminating the ability to go for a weapon.

Noid was right with the No DQ concept being more along the lines of No Holds Barred. I was also going to allow for eye gouges, throat shots, and biting.

And, just to say, this was basically a concept. I hadn't had the time to actually flesh anything out. And I am pretty sure Xero is giving me hell on that part of it.

Xero 02-05-2009 09:52 AM

;)

Krimzon7 02-05-2009 11:06 AM

Too many titles any way. Would rather see a return of the tag titles.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®