Mania Streak vs The Streak
 

Between Taker's streak and Goldberg's streak, which is more impressive kayfabe-wise?

Goldberg, if were talking Keyfabe and forget some of the wins were fabricated it has to be Goldys Streak.

Takers oposition is of higher quality in his streak but once again in Keyfabe to win each and every time is amazing. And in the way he won. Most guys he just ran over in 5 minutes or less.

Goldberg had a Wrestlemania streak?

(Obligatory :shifty: for the tards)

Isn't Goldberg is undefeated at Wrestlemania as well? Double streak.

Yes, yes he does.

1-0 baby!

So what you're saying is, it's not so much "who's next" as it is "who's second?"

Dion Phaneuf

I WENT THERE!

Totally kayfabe, it's Goldberg.

well goldbergs streak ended, takers is still going, gotta go with taker

HBK needs to cattle prod Taker then.

Taker's.


It would have been great if they debuted and pushed Goldberg as undefeated in WWE and put him up against Taker at a Mania with both streaks on the line

lol is this even a serious question?

I think it's a fair question, tbh. The streak was a gigantic part of Goldberg being what he was. Taker's is pretty amazing, too, but I don't know if it is as big a part of what makes Taker Taker as it does for Goldberg.

Having said that, I voted for Taker because I'm a Taker mark and I voted before thinking about it.:p

In Kayfabe, Goldberg. Whilst Undertaker has won only 16 matches at one particular event, Goldberg went 173 straight wins without a loss.

Outside of Wrestlemania, Undertaker has lost a lot of matches.

Of course, this is totally in kayfabe. ;)

Goldberg's streak was second only to Steve Austin in how over it was during that period.

I don't recall undertakers streak even being mentioned much outside of the last couple of wrestlemania's.

What's a kayfabe?

taker.
just because i think his streak was harder to maintain.

why was it harder? Taker had to win only ONE match per year. His streak isn't consecutive is it? He missed some time due to injury didn't he?

I like Goldberg's streak. Besides he kicked the shit out of Bret Hart during the streak.

goldberg

I like how in a thread that has nothing to do with Bret, he is still mentioned. LET IT GO.

The thread asked me for my opinion as to which streak I preferred. I gave my opinion why. Nobody ever sees the first punch Johnny, YOU LET IT GO!

Undertaker he has a victory over the great King Kong Bundy. Goldberg doesn'y have that kayfabe wise the Undertaker went through wrestlersto get where he is at. Goldberg spent a majority of time crushing jobbers, The Undertaker at least went through a challenge.

Kane86 wishes King Kong Bundy would sit on his face.

Taker has dominated over 20 years. That is more impressive than dominating for one.

Taker's win are on the biggest stage of them all.

Goldberg beat Hugh Morrus like 19 times on WCW Saturday Night.

Christian Cage's streak.

Come on that wasn't even a real streak.

Taker's is more impressive because it's still going.

Granted, he didn't get naked.

But technically, none of them are real, so that makes all wrestling streaks equal. So,

So true

You have a point there.....

Considering The Undertaker's streak spans 17 years and Goldberg got the majority of his wins over Hugh Morrus and Hardbody Harrison, I'm going to go with Taker.

Taker in this thread btw. Did vote, but never said that. Do wish Christian Cage's was on, cos that owns all and was clearly the best. Fuck Samoa Joe.

Most of his wins were just over jobbers. Did you see when Regal actually wrestled Goldberg and gave him run for his money? That was classic just shows another reason why Regal is great.

I would've liked to have seen that. Maybe I did even, but just forgot.

To be completely fair, though, Taker has had some shitty opponents in his streak too.

Uhh Really the only shitty match on the streak I can think of as that handicap match he was in. I have liked most of them I think the King Kong Bundy match had a weak finish. Oh, wait Giant Gonzalez I forgot that match sucked fuck monkey nuts. He was killing the business LOL

I hate to say it, but I think Snuka was a shitty match for him at the time.

Either way, I still voted Undertaker here.

Oh yeah, and Mark Henry.

Yeah Snuka was way better then Mark Henry you gotta admit it.

Not like Taker didn't get a few softballs lobbed his way.