TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   sports forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Is it time to tear down Fenway? (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=89277)

Triple Naitch 04-16-2009 07:17 PM

Is it time to tear down Fenway?
 
The Yankees' new stadium opened up today. Their new park is very impressive and I look forward to making a trip out there in a few years. It seems like the Yanks and Sox compete on every level, so is it time for the Sox to go the same route and build a new Fenway? Let's be honest. For as much history the park has, it is a dump. It is terribly cramped and it is impossible to get a ticket if you live outside of New England. A bigger stadium will get more fans, more revenue, and the overall game atmosphere would feel much more comfortable. I say we build a new one and put up a new Green Monster in left.

The Gold Standard 04-16-2009 09:15 PM

I have never been there, but I have heard that it is falling apart, and if Yankee Stadium is gone, then Fenway should be next

Jeritron 04-16-2009 10:16 PM

It is not falling apart. I don't know where you heard that, but 10 years ago that may have been true.
They've done some great things with it and it is very updated.
Also, it's one of the greatest things about baseball.

No. And fuck any of you that voted yes.

Jeritron 04-16-2009 10:34 PM

There's a lot that goes into the situation that most of you may not understand either.

It's not like Yankee Stadium or Shea in terms of it's location and surrounding area. They cannot simply build it right next door where a parking lot once was, and put the parking lot where the old stadium was.
It is in the middle of the city, on a small plot of land.
A newer bigger stadium cannot be built in it's place, or anywhere near it.

This would mean it would have to be built on the outskirts of the city, at the closest.
Not only does that destroy so much of the culture, and tradition of baseball in Boston, but it also causes other massive problems.
Property around the park, and the atmosphere is all Red Sox. There are bars, baseball shops, restraunts, and many many business that are a part of the area.
Landsdowne St. and Yawkey Way are nearly as much of a part of the Red Sox as Fenway is.
It's the hub of the city, and means a great deal to the culture and commerce of the city. Uprooting it would not only destroy traditonal and sentimental feelings. It would destroy property values, and dramatically affect the economics of the city. It'd also change the entire landscape.

Again, difficult to understand because almost every other park in baseball is on a large plot of land somewhere.
Fenway is not Citi Park. It is not Safeco. It's not just some plot of property named after a bank.

Jeritron 04-16-2009 10:37 PM

http://imagecache.allposters.com/ima...ts-Posters.jpg

Boomer 04-16-2009 10:54 PM

All I got to do last summer was walk around it entirely, and that was an experience itself. They better not.

DaveWadding 04-17-2009 04:43 AM

Fuck you. and while we're at it, you can tear down Wrigley Field over my dead rotting fucking corpse.

Evil Vito 04-17-2009 07:27 AM

<font color=goldenrod>Absolutely not.</font>

Supreme Olajuwon 04-17-2009 09:44 AM

I thought the plan to build the new Fenway back in 99 was pretty good. I was sad it fell through.

http://www.ballparks.com/baseball/american/bosbpk03.jpg

DAMN iNATOR 04-17-2009 09:54 AM

Well, we've already pretty much lost the former oldest stadium in Major League Baseball history, even though some would say Tiger Stadium has only been partially demolished. I think Comerica Park is very overrated and should have never been built. It was truly heartbreaking to see Tiger Stadium demolished to the extent it has been, after less than 10 years of not having any baseball played there. Fenway has it's own unique history as well, as America's second-oldest MLB stadium (both stadiums opened on the same day way back in the early 20th Century, Detroit started playing earlier that day, however, so it's technically a few hours older than Fenway). I could only imagine the outrage and heartbreak that would ensue in bean-town, if this magnificent piece of Boston's (and really, America's, if you think about it) fabric. I hope it never has to happen.

BCWWF 04-17-2009 10:15 AM

Yankee Stadium was legendary, but as Jeritron said could be easily rebuilt and replicated. Fenway has character that is simply not seen in newer parks, and I have no problem with a small stadium to keep the demand high.

YOUR Hero 04-17-2009 10:15 AM

The day will come when it'll happen. It might not be for another 20 years. It might be in 3...

El Vaquero de Infierno 04-17-2009 10:29 AM

Not until I've had the chance to go there.

Jeritron 04-17-2009 05:51 PM

Supreme, I remember that. It was a great plan on paper. I remember being really interested in it, since it was probably the best plan possible. It fell through for a lot of reasons though.

Jeritron 04-17-2009 05:53 PM

I definitely feel that if and when it's built, it has to be done right there. I don't care what they have to pay for the surrounding property, or whose dick they have to suck on capitol hill to get the districting. That's the only way to go.

I don't think it's neccessary for quite some time now, though. Also, the concept of transforming the original fenway into a public park and museum was awesome.

Supreme Olajuwon 04-18-2009 12:17 AM

I think I liked that plan so much because they designed it so the Citgo sign would still be over the left field wall.

Loose Cannon 04-18-2009 12:21 AM

no, as much as I hate the Sox, no for me. Great stadium. I will never step foot in that stadium, but great stadium. I've recieved a couple invites to go, but I just can't bring myself to see a game there. It just feels so not right

Team Sheep 04-18-2009 05:01 PM

Almost every stadium in the world that has been around a good 100 years is getting torn down these days, and Fenway will be one of them soon. Yes it will be a sad day, but people have to move on at some stage.

XIII 04-18-2009 05:24 PM

fuckin stupid to tear down fenway

should'nt have tore down the yank

Jesus Shuttlesworth 04-18-2009 10:03 PM

If they tore down the Boston Garden they can tear down Fenway Park in my opinion.

Skippord 04-19-2009 04:14 AM

They should tear down Wrigley and Fenway and Dodger stadium

and every park older than Coors Field :shifty:

Skippord 04-19-2009 04:15 AM

but really they shouldn't tear any stadium down until it is actually falling apart

VonErichLives 04-19-2009 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YOUR Hero (Post 2505329)
The day will come when it'll happen. It might not be for another 20 years. It might be in 3...

yeah, the rumor is they will get through the 100yr anniversary and then look into a new park.

I don't think you'll see it for a while, because the sox ownership bought up a lot of commercial land around there and have put it a lot of places. They wont be able to build on where this one is.

it will either go down by the waterfront or it will have to go outside the city... there just really isn't land anywhere else for it to go.

Also, the new owners have put a lot of money into this one, and they even started this year replacing some of the seats... i'm going in may and I think i'm sitting in one of the areas with "new seats".

I'm happy with these owners, we have 2 championships...

however, I wanted McCourt and O'Donnel... mostly because McCourt had all that water front property and you would have had an amazing new stadium.

Fenyway is great, a classic... but it truely is one of the worst places to watch a game, over half if not 2/3 of the seats don't even face the field correctly... there are very few seats you can see the whole field from and the ones you can require you trying to turn 90 degrees in your seat.

oh and no, i doubt baseball would let the new stadium have a "monster" nor should they... (the monster wall is grandfathered because it's to close in to play for mlb rules). you don't duplicate a classic like that. you event a new park with a new feel, etc...

VonErichLives 04-19-2009 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus Shuttlesworth (Post 2508310)
If they tore down the Boston Garden they can tear down Fenway Park in my opinion.

remember everyone who flipped out over that...

I pretty happy with the new place... no leaky roof, no fog games, a lot of other things... yeah, time moves on.

Jesus Shuttlesworth 04-19-2009 01:26 PM

Makes a much enjoyable experience and with the amount of cashflow you gotta pay to go to a game now I think that should be taken into consideration. The atmosphere at Fenway would be tough to be recreated but having the smallest park in one of the biggest baseball market makes no sense for the fans or the organization. I mean I like Fenway as much as the next guy but I would enjoy being able to go to a few games a year without it costing me an arm and a leg just to get a seat (if I can even get one through a 3rd party)

VonErichLives 04-19-2009 03:12 PM

yeah and it can be done tastefully down the waterfront and doesn't have to be a 60K seat park...

look at Gillette, he could have made the place 100K but didn't... and I think the waiting list for seasons is still more then the people it can hold.

screech 04-22-2009 01:49 AM

Absolutely not. It is not falling apart, and as Jeri said, it would be much more difficult to build a new park in Boston (or the Boston area), than it was to build the new stadiums in say New York or Philly.

VonErichLives 04-22-2009 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by screech (Post 2513640)
Absolutely not. It is not falling apart, and as Jeri said, it would be much more difficult to build a new park in Boston (or the Boston area), than it was to build the new stadiums in say New York or Philly.

Difficult? no, just the usually pay off the politicians... and we'd have a state of the art park down the waterfront area.

falling apart... technically no... but wasn't it last year they were doing work over the club seats behind home plate and part of the upperdeck fell? or was that the year before?

Supreme Olajuwon 04-22-2009 10:17 AM

I think one of the reasons the Sox have held onto Fenway (and this applies to Wrigley too) for so long is because it was their link to the greatness of their past teams. People were afraid that if they got rid of the stadium, the team would lose its identity and they'd become their own isolated team with no real connection to the franchise's past greatness like in Detroit. As long as they still had Fenway, they could still hold on to the franchise's legacy.

But now, the Red Sox don't need that link, because they're currently their own great team. They could build a new stadium and keep their identity as a franchise because the great team would be making the move with them.

DaveWadding 04-22-2009 01:44 PM

Good theory, but the Sox actually had great teams that played in Fenway. The Cubs never won shit at Wrigley.

DAMN iNATOR 04-22-2009 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loose Cannon (Post 2506709)
no, as much as I hate the Sox, no for me. Great stadium. I will never step foot in that stadium, but great stadium. I've recieved a couple invites to go, but I just can't bring myself to see a game there. It just feels so not right

Well of course, it's kind of like (and these are only meant for diehard fans of one team or the other):

A.) Asking a Chicago Bears fan to come watch the Bears play the Packers at Lambeau Field.

or

B.) Asking a Chicago White Sox fan to come to Wrigley Field to watch them play the Chicago Cubs (or vice versa, OBV.).

VonErichLives 04-23-2009 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Supreme Olajuwon (Post 2513975)
I think one of the reasons the Sox have held onto Fenway (and this applies to Wrigley too) for so long is because it was their link to the greatness of their past teams. People were afraid that if they got rid of the stadium, the team would lose its identity and they'd become their own isolated team with no real connection to the franchise's past greatness like in Detroit. As long as they still had Fenway, they could still hold on to the franchise's legacy.

But now, the Red Sox don't need that link, because they're currently their own great team. They could build a new stadium and keep their identity as a franchise because the great team would be making the move with them.

you might think that, but you'd be wrong.

it's all about money and location.

This park has a great location, near multiple public transportations, walking distance from nearby cities, and such and there isn't a huge chunk of land left to put a big park and then have to run access to it.

Gillette is a great stadium but the traffic is horrible and the only non-driving option is taking the Amtrak Train.

I believe there is still some space down the waterfront to do it, or places they could take by eminent domain w/o too much of a fight, but that's also changing because they're build new restaurants down there for multi-millions so it would cost more or be a bigger fight to do it.

Had McCourt/O'Donnel gotten the team they would have put a new park there because McCourt owns most that land.

I suspect they'll get through the 100yr anniversary (expect the All-star game to be here) and then have plans for a new park somewhere.

Team Sheep 04-24-2009 07:45 AM

Almost every new stadium now a days is built out of town. That's the inevitable downside to it really.

DAMN iNATOR 04-24-2009 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Team Sheep (Post 2518100)
Almost every new stadium now a days is built out of town. That's the inevitable downside to it really.

Well, I mean, let's take Tiger Stadium for example: Built, 1911. Demolished (partially): sometime since the last game in Sept. 1999. It doesn't matter where it was built, people want to see it stay around in some small form because of nostalgia. I remember my father taking me to a game there one day in '84, when I was just 3. I didn't realize or appreciate it at the time because I was too young, but as we all know, the Tigers had a truly magical season that year, and captured the World Series, not to mention I grew to become one of the biggest George "Sparky" Anderson fans you could find as a kid...

But soon along came Comerica Park. It doesn't matter that much to me or others where the construction materials came from to make it. The construction, in my eyes, is never complete until all the memories for players, fans, managers, etc., etc., &c. ad nauseam, stop with the final game and the stadium being torn down.

I hope you see my point, Team Sheep.

Team Sheep 04-24-2009 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAMN iNATOR (Post 2518409)
Well, I mean, let's take Tiger Stadium for example: Built, 1911. Demolished (partially): sometime since the last game in Sept. 1999. It doesn't matter where it was built, people want to see it stay around in some small form because of nostalgia. I remember my father taking me to a game there one day in '84, when I was just 3. I didn't realize or appreciate it at the time because I was too young, but as we all know, the Tigers had a truly magical season that year, and captured the World Series, not to mention I grew to become one of the biggest George "Sparky" Anderson fans you could find as a kid...

But soon along came Comerica Park. It doesn't matter that much to me or others where the construction materials came from to make it. The construction, in my eyes, is never complete until all the memories for players, fans, managers, etc., etc., &c. ad nauseam, stop with the final game and the stadium being torn down.

I hope you see my point, Team Sheep.

Not sure I understand what you're saying. You mean if they built a new stadium elsewhere they should tear down Fenway completely?

Boondock Saint 04-24-2009 02:45 PM

Nah

WestNZ 04-28-2009 05:50 PM

I say dont take it down, seeing that i am planning a trip America to watch a game in each MLB park in the next few years. I would love to watch a game there

VonErichLives 05-02-2009 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Team Sheep (Post 2518647)
Not sure I understand what you're saying. You mean if they built a new stadium elsewhere they should tear down Fenway completely?

if they build a new park fenway will get torn down, the real estate it worth way too much and w/o the team there will hurt that area to an extent... they'll put a mall or concert hall or something.

unless they can work a deal for an NL expansion team which had been talked about, or get college sports to play there.

Jesus Shuttlesworth 05-02-2009 07:15 PM

Don't think college sports would work in that spot, outside of Boston College football nobody really draws big crowds and BC just recently put a ton of money into their stadium. Plus BC football doesn't exactly draw in tons of people like other BCS schools and they only have a like 6 or 7 home dates anyway.

VonErichLives 05-02-2009 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus Shuttlesworth (Post 2529400)
Don't think college sports would work in that spot, outside of Boston College football nobody really draws big crowds and BC just recently put a ton of money into their stadium. Plus BC football doesn't exactly draw in tons of people like other BCS schools and they only have a like 6 or 7 home dates anyway.

I don't think any of them would sell out the park, but operate it at 1/2 capacity for the conseccion income is possible.

and yeah, I don't think BC would go there, they actually draw pretty well even against shit teams.

come to think of it... what does Alumni hold now? it may even hold more then fenway?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®