Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasney
(Post 2562075)
I've ripped this from a poster on another site because I completly agree with it
|
I agree with his outrage, but not necessarily all his points:
Quote:
This is probably the stupidest thing that Sony has ever done.
|
really? Even over making an 800 dollar children's toy?
Quote:
The PSP Go is completely incompatible with the PSP. It will not play any existing PSP games, and you can't even use content from a PSP via a memory card, because it doesn't use the same memory cards. This means you're going to have a complete split between the PSP and PSP Go.
|
To be fair, they are divorcing themselves from the two worst elements of the PSP: The proprietary and failed UMD, and the expensive, proprietary Memory sticks. On the second front, though...is it true they're going with the Memory Stick micro, which even most of their own company has bailed on? If so, it's dumb, but removes one of the existing points, as you can use an adapter to transfer shit. Oops.
Quote:
So, we're taking a moderately successful platform, and creating a completely separate version of it. We're throwing away all of the install base they've managed to gain, and we're also throwing away the entire back catalog of PSP games.
|
The latter is ostensibly true, provided they don't put the back catalogue online to buy. The former isn't even remotely true.
However, consider that the Go may be intended for a different market. It's not actually replacing the PSP 3000 or whatever the current model is. HDD MP3 players didn't do away with the CD player market, and even though the marker for the latter has dwindled, we're talking several gens of hardware later. So with Sony, it'll probably be one gen or less, but it's hardly like they're dropping the market or truly dividing the base. some people want internal storage.
Quote:
It's pretty obvious that nobody who actually bought a PSP will be upgrading to a PSP Go if none of the games will work on the bloody thing.
|
It's pretty obvious he's never paid attention to consumer trends.
Quote:
They're obviously going after people who don't already own a PSP.
|
Not solely, no, but why is this even a statement worth making?
Quote:
From a developers point of view, this is bad. No upgrade path means that anyone who has a PSP will be forced to keep it, so you'll have to keep making games for it. Since the PSP Go is where the growth will be, you have to make games for that as well.
|
I don't see the problem here. Aren't all indicators on this being the same hardware? So, like, you can make a UMD version and an electronic version of the same game with almost zero dev issues?
Quote:
There's a pretty big difference between downloadable games and games delivered on a disc. 1.5GB is really too much to download on a portable, especially one with only 16GB of storage to work with (and extra storage costing more than it did on the PSP, and something like four times as much as an SD card). So the storage is scarce and, outside of the US, bandwidth is kind of expensive too. So that removes one of the only advantages the PSP has. Outside of piracy, images of UMDs just aren't going to cut it.
|
We have some of the worst bandwidth in the western world. USA! USA!
How many games actually use a full DL UMD, anyway? How will compression factor in? how will the adapter on the Memory Sticks factor into the "premium" cost of the new format?
Quote:
You could turn this into an advantage, and make games bigger than a UMD
|
This seems stupid. Going from "Games are too big, downloading is too costly!" to "They could make games bigger than a UMD" as an advantage with oen mere line break? Surely this guy forgot his ritalin.
Quote:
Speaking of taking the wrong lessons from the DS - we have a design that you can open to play games, or close to make it smaller to carry around. Fine. Just missing one of the more important features of the DS design - it protects the screens. This thing just leaves the entire exposed surface as the screen. It's not even recessed or anything. It's going to get scratched to bits.
|
so it's exactly like most devices on the market, and will rely on a screen protector or protective casing. The thing was intended to be used for waching movies in the closed position, a feat that would be difficult of the screen was hidden. Doesn't sound like it's a "bad" idea, per se, just not one I'd waste time on.