TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   The Book Back in The E? (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=95304)

taker707 10-08-2009 01:31 AM

The Book Back in The E?
 
Source: PW.net

According to sources, current TNA World Tag Team Champion Booker T is not expected to stay with TNA once his contract expires with the company. Booker, whose deal with TNA is rumored to expire in November (he signed with TNA in November 2007), reportedly refused to put over Matt Morgan at last night’s TNA Impact TV tapings in Orlando and the general feeling among those in the company is that this could have been the “last straw” in his rocky relationship with TNA management as of late.

Were told Booker made it clear to various wrestlers during last week’s overseas tour and again in the locker room at the TV tapings this week in Orlando that he has options in WWE and intends to return once he is contractually able to do so. While nothing is official of course, TNA sources are indicating that his days with the company could be numbered. The buzz right now is that he will appear at Bound For Glory and drop the TNA tag titles with Scott Steiner at that show or at the tapings that will follow and not be booked again by the company. What this means for the Main Event Mafia group from a TV perspective is anyone’s guess at this point.

This isn’t the first time something negative backstage has taken place with Booker as he has been described as having a negative attitude in the locker room for months now. In regards to the situation with Matt Morgan, he reportedly made it clear he wasn’t happy about this decision when he found out on the overseas tour. While there is said to be no heat between Booker or Morgan, Booker reportedly felt it was a mistake for him to lose the match on TV instead of PPV. Booker was said to have cooled down about it during the tour and had a lengthy conversation with TNA President Dixie Carter on Monday only to turn around the next day and refuse to put Morgan over around 45 minutes before the actual taping. He also created quite the situation during the overseas tour in refusing to wrestle in a main event in Switzerland when fans threw chairs and other objects into the ring. Booker and his wife Sharmell walked out on the match. Sheik Abdul Bashir later came out to replace Booker to conclude the show.

ron the dial 10-08-2009 01:35 AM

i'm disappointed in your lack of question marks.

Juan 10-08-2009 01:38 AM

I would love to see Booker back in the WWE

Xero 10-08-2009 01:38 AM

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XuFe0vgMO2E&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XuFe0vgMO2E&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

KYR 10-08-2009 01:39 AM

Shame on Booker.

Fancy not wanting to get into the ring while the fans were throwing chairs.

Shame Booker Shame.

As for the rest of it - Pfffftt. Same story, different name whenever it gets close to their contract ending.

DAMN iNATOR 10-08-2009 03:02 AM

??????
 
<EMBED height=364 type=application/x-shockwave-flash width=445 src=http://www.youtube.com/v/5Qhu9pbnk_U&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0xe1600f&color2=0xfebd01&border=1 allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true">

<object width="445" height="364"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/S0Z4UP731-M&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0xe1600f&color2=0xfebd01&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S0Z4UP731-M&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0xe1600f&color2=0xfebd01&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364"></embed></object>
</EMBED>

Juan 10-08-2009 03:14 AM

Yes, those are his entrance themes, DAMN iNATOR.

DAMN iNATOR 10-08-2009 03:21 AM

Always for some reason preferred his WWE Originals theme over his "traditional" WWF/E theme...

Dave Youell 10-08-2009 03:25 AM

It's a star, so WWE will eat him up with a spoon right now, but honestly, I couldn't give 2 shits about Booker, I think he used to be entertaining, but wasn't ever that good in the ring IMO

DAMN iNATOR 10-08-2009 03:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Youell (Post 2760034)
It's a star, so WWE will eat him up with a spoon right now, but honestly, I couldn't give 2 shits about Booker, I think he used to be entertaining, but wasn't ever that good in the ring IMO


5 WCW World Championships + 1 WWE World Heavyweight Championship say you are incorrect.

Mr. Nerfect 10-08-2009 04:32 AM

I like Booker. He can still be a good worker, and he finally worked out how to play a heel in 2006. The crowd will pop for him when he returns, and I would truthfully like to see him win the actual WWE Championship at least once in his career.

Tazz Dan 10-08-2009 04:33 AM

Doesn't mean he was good.

Dave Youell 10-08-2009 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAMN iNATOR (Post 2760043)
5 WCW World Championships + 1 WWE World Heavyweight Championship say you are incorrect.

So did Hogan, and I put him in the same bracket

As do I Cena

They entertain me, but I don't enjoy seeing their matches compared to pretty much anything else on the card.

You don't have to be a great wrestler to be world champion nowadays, and the whole 5 time WCW championship thing is a joke, didn't the belt change hands 20 times within a 12 month period towards the end, holding the belt towards the end of WCW doesn't give you credability IMO.

I thought the stuff he used to do with Goldust was very entertaining, as a main event guy in WWE, the only times I found him interesting was when he was feuding with HHH for Mania 19, mainly because I wanted the belt off HHH, not because I liked Booker, and his King Booker stuff, at the start, then that shit got dull, and he never produced main event calibre matches on WWE tv, so that, is why I have that opinion of Booker

The Mackem 10-08-2009 08:11 AM

I think this just goes to show what the wrestling business at the top is all about. At one time it was Booker T's opponents that refused to put him over. However, I do see is original point about putting Morgan over on PPV and not TV.

ClockShot 10-08-2009 08:41 AM

He'll go back, bitch and moan to Vince when he doesn't get his way like last time, and leave again.

Then again, maybe he should just hang 'em up.

thecc 10-08-2009 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Mackem (Post 2760194)
I think this just goes to show what the wrestling business at the top is all about. At one time it was Booker T's opponents that refused to put him over. However, I do see is original point about putting Morgan over on PPV and not TV.

Except you don't decide this 45 minutes before the tapings.

owenbrown 10-08-2009 09:20 AM

shut up taker707

owenbrown 10-08-2009 09:20 AM

that should ALWAYS be the first reply in a taker707 thread BTW

The Mackem 10-08-2009 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thecc (Post 2760259)
Except you don't decide this 45 minutes before the tapings.

:y:

That's what I'm saying, you'd think he'd know from his time in WCW how much that shits on the whole promotion.

Theo Dious 10-08-2009 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAMN iNATOR (Post 2760043)
5 WCW World Championships + 1 WWE World Heavyweight Championship say you are incorrect.

I know others pretty much covered this, but I'm just amazed at the fact that anyone still thinks championships=good in the ring.

That being said, I'm even more amazed that someone would think that Booker was never good in the ring.

Y2Ant 10-08-2009 11:08 AM

Didn't Austin do the same thing cause he wouldn't put Lesnar over on TV?

Afterlife 10-08-2009 11:13 AM

Booker T and Goldust was great, because of Goldust.

Booker T without Goldust was bland and annoying, because of Booker T.


A Rumble spot could be interesting; outside of that, he's about as entertaining as Batista.

Ol Dirty Dastard 10-08-2009 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Afterlife (Post 2760431)
Booker T and Goldust was great, because of Goldust.

Booker T without Goldust was bland and annoying, because of Booker T.


A Rumble spot could be interesting; outside of that, he's about as entertaining as Batista.

lol wow

Afterlife 10-08-2009 11:32 AM

His lovely wife didn't help his entertainment value, either.

Ol Dirty Dastard 10-08-2009 11:35 AM

Yeah I already decided you don't know what you're talking about.

screech 10-08-2009 11:37 AM

I like Booker, and I think he can put on good matches, but having him back in the E would mean continuing to see Sharmell on TV.

That would be awful.

Afterlife 10-08-2009 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gorgeous Dale Newstead (Post 2760459)
Yeah I already decided you don't know what you're talking about.

That's o.k., precious; go back to sleep. :wave:

Afterlife 10-08-2009 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by screech (Post 2760464)
I like Booker, and I think he can put on good matches, but having him back in the E would mean continuing to see Sharmell on TV.

That would be awful.


Hearing her is even worse.

screech 10-08-2009 11:41 AM

Indeed it is.

The Jayman 10-08-2009 11:46 AM

"All hail King Booker!!" a thousand times did make me want to shoot myself

Afterlife 10-08-2009 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jayman (Post 2760485)
"Aww hail King Bookaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!!" a thousand times did make me want to shoot myself

Indubitably.

The Ravishing One 10-08-2009 01:03 PM

KING BOOKA!!

The Ravishing One 10-08-2009 01:04 PM

Id be up for seeing him return, but as soon as he'd hit the ring i'd be bored.

The Ravishing One 10-08-2009 01:04 PM

He needs Goldust instead of Sharmell.

kareru 10-08-2009 01:42 PM

good

only steiner and nash to go and they have a great roster again, sting is retiring and i wouldn't mind kurt angle staying.

i didn't like these 'superstars' being there in the first place, it was the other guys that made tna a contender and the older guys were just riding the gravy train whilst the guys that practically built the company were pushed back, its not as if the older guys have done anything special whilst at tna, i dont know how it seemed to anyone else but to me it seemed as if they didn't really want to be there.

Juan 10-08-2009 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by owenbrown (Post 2760262)
that should ALWAYS be the first reply in a taker707 thread BTW

:n:

Juan 10-08-2009 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gorgeous Dale Newstead (Post 2760459)
Yeah I already decided you don't know what you're talking about.

lol

Afterlife 10-08-2009 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Ravishing One (Post 2760611)
Id be up for seeing him return, but as soon as he'd hit the ring i'd be bored.

Pretty much. That's why I suggest a Royal Rumble one-off.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Ravishing One (Post 2760612)
He needs Goldust instead of Sharmell.


True. But with the new popularity Goldust is building, I think something like Booker T would just hinder him.

Fox 10-08-2009 07:55 PM

Vince will make him job to Triple H within the first three months just to punish him.

VINCE: "You remember why you left now?!"

BOOKER: "Yes!"

VINCE: "Are you gonna leave again?!"

BOOKER: "No!"

VINCE: "Good Superstar..."

Droford 10-08-2009 08:01 PM

I will only mark for..

"FINALLY..THE BOOK...HAS COME BACK...to.." wherever the hell he shows up


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®