TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   From what I understand TNA is going to start doing live tv against Raw? (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=97608)

BigDaddyCool 12-09-2009 02:11 PM

From what I understand TNA is going to start doing live tv against Raw?
 
I haven't watched in a while...but do they seriously think they can comepete?

Londoner 12-09-2009 02:27 PM

Its only a one off to see what happens.

Xero 12-09-2009 02:29 PM

Yeah, it's basically a trial. I'm sure if they do decent they'll move to Mondays after the Road to WrestleMania. If they were smart, anyway.

Droford 12-09-2009 02:36 PM

I wonder if they'll go 8-10 to at least catch people for the first hour or if they'll be stupid and go up against RAW directly 9-11.

Interesting enough, with DVRs now it might not be that bad as long as theres nothing else you want to watch on Mondays.

Xero 12-09-2009 02:38 PM

I could see them actually making it 3 hours for good like Nitro.

Jordan 12-09-2009 02:39 PM

I think 3 hours would be a good idea, especially if they don't have another show other than TNA Epics.

BigDaddyCool 12-09-2009 02:47 PM

I just think TNA is dumb.

Xero 12-09-2009 02:48 PM

This is make it or break it for TNA. If they fail here, they won't go down much (I don't think, unless Hogan fucks shit up backstage) but it will cement them as never being able to be on par with WWE.

BigDaddyCool 12-09-2009 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xero (Post 2849250)
This is make it or break it for TNA. If they fail here, they won't go down much (I don't think, unless Hogan fucks shit up backstage) but it will cement them as never being able to be on par with WWE.

But they have already done that by refusing to tour, refusing to make new stars when old ones can be bought, and refusing to let the in ring action talk for itself.

SammyG 12-09-2009 03:09 PM

again Raw

ron the dial 12-09-2009 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2849294)
refusing to make new stars when old ones can be bought

have you even watched recently? no, you haven't. shut it up.

fanatic7707 12-09-2009 03:11 PM

Depends on the ratings. Let's not forget while football season is in play they'll have to go up against Monday Night Football.

Schlomey 12-09-2009 03:12 PM

TNA ratings on a non WWE night like Thursdays is only as good as the piddly ECW rating.

This is a bad idea.

ron the dial 12-09-2009 03:14 PM

honestly, i don't see the point in going head to head on monday night. broadcasting live and touring would be 2 things i would look at doing first.

BigDaddyCool 12-09-2009 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Weapon X (Post 2849335)
have you even watched recently? no, you haven't. shut it up.

Not really, but I see they have signed Hogan
Quote:

Originally Posted by fanatic7707 (Post 2849336)
Depends on the ratings. Let's not forget while football season is in play they'll have to go up against Monday Night Football.

Interesting
Quote:

Originally Posted by Schlomey (Post 2849337)
TNA ratings on a non WWE night like Thursdays is only as good as the piddly ECW rating.

This is a bad idea.

Well WWE doesn't invest anything in ECW. And I would say TNA does have more star power than ECW.

Schlomey 12-09-2009 03:15 PM

TNA is a heavily producded show that relies a lot of pre-taped segments and re-filmings....Good luck going live on a whim.

ron the dial 12-09-2009 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2849340)

Not really, but I see they have signed Hogan

my point still stands. you don't know what you're talking about.

BigDaddyCool 12-09-2009 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Weapon X (Post 2849338)
honestly, i don't see the point in going head to head on monday night. broadcasting live and touring would be 2 things i would look at doing first.

I agree completely with this. The live TV they have done before sucked.

Schlomey 12-09-2009 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2849340)

Well WWE doesn't invest anything in ECW. And I would say TNA does have more star power than ECW.



The point is that even with their "star power" they are only drawing a rating the size of ECW which is considered a training ground..>Not full of icons like Foley,Sting & Steiner ect...

just seems like a a baaad idea. Now if TNA was pushing a 2/3 rating on a Thursday then sure try it out...But they are only doing a 1. something on a weekly basis which is scary.

BigDaddyCool 12-09-2009 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Weapon X (Post 2849345)
my point still stands. you don't know what you're talking about.

TNA has a strong stigma attached to it. And just glancing at their roster, it is about 50/50 with hasbeens to new people.

They might be doing good now, but I remember not so long ago where if you didn't already make a name before getting in tna, you wouldn't.

ron the dial 12-09-2009 03:18 PM

if they're hoping to garner ratings based on "HEY MONDAY NIGHT WARS ALL OVER AGAIN" mentality from the fans, i think they're going to be disappointed. anybody who gives a fuck about that has already tuned into TNA and make their decision. hogan will bring in new viewers, but that will only last for so long. i don't see any of this bringing TNA into the "big time" and making them legit competition for WWE.

Schlomey 12-09-2009 03:19 PM

We have already had the Monday Night Wars...and as we know now...The WWE will always win.

ron the dial 12-09-2009 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2849354)
TNA has a strong stigma attached to it. And just glancing at their roster, it is about 50/50 with hasbeens to new people.

They might be doing good now, but I remember not so long ago where if you didn't already make a name before getting in tna, you wouldn't.

i don't disagree with this. i didn't watch TNA for a long time because of this. but they've done a solid job of building up their own new stars recently, and that is what's making me tune in. none of this other garbage they're tossing around.

Steveviscious89 12-09-2009 03:48 PM

Many of you guys have to remember that most fans are not like us. They aren't thinking through whether or not the company has made 'good' decisions and then sort of basing their opinions on that. When wrestling was at its peak, I would say the majority of fans weren't all that tuned into the business, it was just entertaining for them. I hate to say this but it's going to come down to a lot of personality in order to bring in the television ratings. BDC's assessment of the TNA talent is a no-brainer...of course you won't make it big if no one is watching, so you bring in the so called 'has beens' so that people will have some recognizable faces to associate with. This is really the only reason they are there, and also one of the big reasons Hogan is there. He really isn't suppose to wrestle hardly at all.

Londoner 12-09-2009 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Weapon X (Post 2849345)
my point still stands. you don't know what you're talking about.

That is BDC you're talking to, you should be used to his attitude by now.

BigDaddyCool 12-09-2009 04:11 PM

omg, bdc obiviously doesn't know what he is talking about because he doesn't just admit TNA is the greatest wrestling promotion ever.

Shut up TL.

Jeritron 12-09-2009 04:18 PM

do you care for Swagger?

BigDaddyCool 12-09-2009 04:21 PM

Still don't.

Londoner 12-09-2009 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2849441)
omg, bdc obiviously doesn't know what he is talking about because he doesn't just admit TNA is the greatest wrestling promotion ever.

Shut up TL.

Bit defensive there eh?

Schlomey 12-09-2009 04:36 PM

well typically when someone goes on the offensive the correct thing to do is get defensive....right?

BigDaddyCool 12-09-2009 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schlomey (Post 2849482)
well typically when someone goes on the offensive the correct thing to do is get defensive....right?

No...that makes to much sense.

Londoner 12-09-2009 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schlomey (Post 2849482)
well typically when someone goes on the offensive the correct thing to do is get defensive....right?

It was hardly going on the 'offensive' though, just a truthful statement on BDC's normal attitude.

BigDaddyCool 12-09-2009 04:49 PM

What, my attitude of TNA has been constant disappointment, why should one live TNA on Monday be any different? Is that the attitude you mean? Or the attitude where I don't just conform with the rest of IWC on Jericho is the greatest, WWE sucks but I won't quit watching, or Nameless Indy Guy #3563 is going to make it huge now that he signed with WWE...oh wait they already cut him.

Thanks for coming by.

Londoner 12-09-2009 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2849512)
What, my attitude of TNA has been constant disappointment, why should one live TNA on Monday be any different? Is that the attitude you mean? Or the attitude where I don't just conform with the rest of IWC on Jericho is the greatest, WWE sucks but I won't quit watching, or Nameless Indy Guy #3563 is going to make it huge now that he signed with WWE...oh wait they already cut him.

Thanks for coming by.

That's not what i mean, as weapon x said, you don't watch it, therefore you don't have the right to a proper opinion on it, and you always think you do.

Schlomey 12-09-2009 04:53 PM

Wrestling in general has been boring me lately....TNA just makes it worse. I like some of what they do and some of who they have but I just can't force myself to like the majority of their programming.

BigDaddyCool 12-09-2009 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TL (Post 2849517)
That's not what i mean, as weapon x said, you don't watch it, therefore you don't have the right to a proper opinion on it, and you always think you do.

Oh, so I haven't been watching wrestling for the past month, therefore I don't know what I'm talking about? The wrestling business changed that much since I stopped watching? Shut the fuck up.

Londoner 12-09-2009 05:01 PM

Your posts just prove to me what i was saying really.

BigDaddyCool 12-09-2009 05:02 PM

So wrestling has changed drastically over a month?

screech 12-09-2009 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schlomey (Post 2849344)
TNA is a heavily producded show that relies a lot of pre-taped segments and re-filmings....Good luck going live on a whim.

TNA has done a live iMPACT! at least once. It was in October of last year when they did it from Vegas (first broadcast in HD I believe), and when MEM first became a faction.

Londoner 12-09-2009 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool (Post 2849532)
So wrestling has changed drastically over a month?

Not drastically but recent raw and tna shows have been alot more enjoyable. Smackdowns still good.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®