Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AlphaBean
Remember when the Colts moved to Indy, and the Browns moved to Baltimore?
Cause you know, both times they were cases of the city "not deserving a team." Right?
|
Did I ever say that LA (or any other city for that matter) didn't deserve a team? No. Thanks for playing asshole.
My point is: (and listen up Miz, you fucking child) Los Angeles isn't the end all and be all of NFL cities. They have had 2 teams already and they both moved out. For whatever reason it was, they did. I'm not looking it up and I hate the fucking Raiders anyways.
If LA was such a holy grail of cities, wouldn't they have a new team already? They talk about the Chargers moving there, the Seahawks, even the fucking Colts at one point were linked with moving to LA. No of it happened. Why? All the teams got a new stadium deal.
Seems like the only thing LA has to do with the NFL now is that teams will threaten to move there in order to get a new stadium built where they already are.
And what team would want to play in the Coliseum? It's a piece of shit.
Like I said, the Saints are better off staying in San Antonio for good. The city has wanted a team for awhile now, and the Alamodome would be a good start until they got a new deal in place. The people are already there and they would have a good fan base to start with.
And as the reports are coming in, it seems like the Saints wont be able to go back to New Orleans at all.... it might not be a city anymore once the water is drained.