|
I'm not denying anything you are saying, I am just saying that LSU is recognized as the 2003 National Champions. Even otherwise, you can say that USC deserved a share of the national championship, but you can't call them national champions, because they hold absolutely nothing over LSU.
Thats why I am pointing it out, on tv and in magazines they continue to say can USC win its third national championship, so even if you do consider USC as a co-national champion, it takes a lot away from LSU who actually did win the national championship and by any account deserved to be in that game.
|