Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Miz
That is ridiculous. Hafner can't help that he was injured.
So if Ortiz missed 2 weeks and Hafner played the whole season you would give the MVP to Hafner before Ortiz, right VEL? Of course not, that argument is retarded.
Both are excellent candidates but the Indians are barely a .500 they'd be much better off than Cleveland.
Hafner Sept numbers: 10, 24, 1.203
Ortiz Sept numbers: 10, 22, 1.152
|
No Miz, your math is retarded.
1) 115 AB's in 2 weeks, that's one hell of a 2 weeks, Did they play triple headers?
2) He's having a better Sept, a month that isn't over and a last I checked the season started in April?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BCWWF
You don't have to play the whole season to be considered. Shannon Stewart got votes when he was on the Twins for a half season because he singlehanded brought them back into the playoff race. The Red Sox aren't some magnificent powerhouse this season, just because Ortiz has good numbers doesn't automatically make him the MVP.
|
I never said he shouldn't be considered, I said I'd give it to Ortiz or A-rod before him.
getting "some votes" doesn't mean he won MVP and doesn't mean in my opinion he should be, nor does it mean he deserves it more then Ortiz or A-rod.
You're right, the Red Sox aren't some magnificent powerhouse, which is more the reason for Ortiz.
Hey, you guys have your opinions, I have mine.
While September is a huge month, what A-rod had better numbers then he has now, same team, except say A-rod has 5-10 more HR's, 20 more RBI's and oh yeah, the Yanks are 10 games up and already clinched?
So are you two now telling me if your not in a "tight pennent race" you can't be MVP?
If you don't help your team into the playoffs you can't be MVP?