|
I think when you are talking about a person who may or may not be the best at there positions. All team accomplishments should be thrown out. Superbowl rings ect. How do you say Brady is the best QB in the league because his team was amazing and won 3 rings. Not saying he didnt have a hand in that, but still. I think you judge the best by what he does. Not his team. Brady is one of the best. Honestly. I think him and Manning are neck and neck now. I would have said Manning no doubt last year, but i was impressed with Brady vs Pitt and i've been very impressed with his skills.
LT is clearly the best RB. Its no doubt. He doesnt have to have rings. Its so obviously clear. Alexander is a short second, but he's no where near as good as LT is.
12-12 was good. That was special considering the circumstanceds, but it was nothing to boost him over Manning as the best in the league. Just put him neck and neck i think. If Brady would have did like Manning did against the Chargers last year and send the punt team back off the field and convince the coach to let him run the 4th down play at there own 20 with the game on the line and complete it, then go down and get the TD. I might consider him as good and maybe better.
I'm starting to think that until Manning wins this ring this year , its near impossible to compare the two because no matter what gets said, the whole rings argument gets brought up.
|