Thread: Official Bound For Glory thread--10/23/05
View Single Post
Old 10-24-2005, 12:45 AM   #223
Fox
"Ask him!"
 
Fox's Avatar
 
Posts: 10,072
Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PureHatred
LC and Fox are looking at this from two totally different viewpoints; one as a hardcore wrestling fan, and one as a booker and how they should/wqould be trying to make money.

Rhino seriously has not been treated as a main eventer on TNA. I know that part of it is that they were building up JJ/Nash, so there was no reason to build Rhino up for a title shot; this was just a last second decisison. But still...

So basically the question became whether it made more sense to put the belt on a guy who has only been on TV in a passing manner in the last month, who had almost zero heat headed into the PPv or to keep the belt on JJ, TNA's most established commodity.

I would've let JJ retain.
That does about sum it up, and I disagree - Rhino should have, and did, win. Differences of opinion are what make life interesting.

Thanks for the debate LC. Later.
Fox is offline   Reply With Quote