Thread: WWE non-compete's...
View Single Post
Old 11-07-2005, 03:41 PM   #5
Xero
He's Here
 
Xero's Avatar
 
Posts: 60,735
Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TerranRich
"Non-compete" sometimes only means "non-wrestling". Ric Flair, upon leaving WWF and returning to WCW in 1993 (?) was under a non-compete clause, but he was put on TV right away, just in a non-wrestling role, in his own segment called "Flair For The Gold", according to The Death of WCW. For 90 days, I believe, he was in a non-wrestling role. Once the term was up, he wrestled, but was still on TV until then. Maybe that's changed, or maybe that was a special case for Flair, being greatness and all.
I wonder if it would count as wrestling if he took any bumps whatsoever...
Xero is offline   Reply With Quote