Quote:
Originally Posted by Destor
The claim isn't bullshit, and legally he is 100% in the right. Vince owns these things, and has legal right to ensure no one profits from/promotes his property against his will. The problem is its trivial and its lowers the shining character of Vince (  ) and the WWE. It makes them look like they fear TNA. A fact I know isn't true, but it is the impression that they give.
|
Howabout no?
Vince isn't 100% in the right, because he owns a trademark. Trademark is designed to prevent market confusion and stop other people from succeeding based upon your name, possibly at your expense. Are you stating that:
1. You believe that the TNA chants are actually what get viewers to watch?
2. TNA is actually identifying themselves as ECW in some way by their fans chanting it?
3. There is any damage caused by TNA, to the WWE or ECW?
TNA doesn't use the lettermark or identify themselves in any way with ECW. Legally, that's where the limit to the claim ends for the most part. Now I know it's already been stated that this is probably a bullshit story, but I did want to clear the air that Vince is
not in the right and this is a waste of a legal issue if anything
does come of this.