View Single Post
Old 11-23-2005, 12:43 AM   #26
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger
hahahaha

And also lmao @ the TNA marks making up excuses for TNA's decline in the ratings. Some of those people are just unreal.

TNA is declining for a reason...Jarrett, maybe the 6 sided ring?, the Bush League production?
Here's my top 5:

1. Characters. We lack strong face/heel axes, axises, whatever. While Sadistic and TNA's 5 other tardcore fans insist that all you need is storytelling in the ring, that's not what sells TV, and if it was, we'd have seen TNA outscoring the WWE by now. While the WWE has killed their product with characters and storyarcs, it's because they overproduce everything.

2. Production. Yeah, like others are saying, it looks like shit. A poor man's WCW.

3. Jarrett. I don't think I need to say more.

4. Time slot. Both the TNA slots are shit, and randomly switching to a primetime slot doesn't help. People have to know it's on to watch.

5. The roster. Buying up the WWE's leftovers, a champ who jobbed to Chyna of all people, bland faceless folks normal fans can't connect with, and maybe a couple of potential stars. They look like chumps.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote