View Single Post
Old 12-06-2005, 04:07 AM   #5
DaveWadding
LIMITLESS
 
DaveWadding's Avatar
 
Posts: 32,276
DaveWadding makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DaveWadding makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DaveWadding makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DaveWadding makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DaveWadding makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DaveWadding makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DaveWadding makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DaveWadding makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DaveWadding makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DaveWadding makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DaveWadding makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DaveWadding makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DaveWadding makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by VonErich Lives
Wadding really, just STFU and go away, every few months you make a post trying to rip me, w/o actually reading what I wrote and just make yourself look like a bigger idiot each time.

Mathematically, it is possible for SD to win the division, but if you read what I said I don't think that will happen.



So, I'm still saying that LAST YEAR they were a paper team and I'm not saying if I think they are or aren't a paper team this year.

Total record of the teams they beat has little to do with it.

The question is, how many teams with winning records did the beat and how many teams with winning records did they lose to. Also, THE SEASONS NOT OVER YET!

Really, it's like you're the sports/discussion forum version of Rhi.
Wah wah, baby want his bottle? Or is booby gonna make it through the night?

And hey, if you want to get into name calling, you're the sports/discussion forum version of SuperSlim. No wonder you love me so much.

and hey, if you want to get TECHNICAL, I went and researched your definition of a "paper team" (
Quote:
Originally Posted by VEL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gonzo
How can you say they're a paper team when they just hammered their last two opponents?
Because last year they were 2-4 against good teams and 9-1 bad teams.
) and then calculated it your way: 3-3 vs "good" teams (> .500 Winning%) and 5-1 vs. "bad" teams (.500 or worse winning %)

So, either way, I'm right.
DaveWadding is offline