Thread: Everyone's been talking about a TNA TV Title, but what about a WWE TV Title?
View Single Post
Old 01-03-2006, 02:45 AM   #1
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,541
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Everyone's been talking about a TNA TV Title, but what about a WWE TV Title?
Alright, just feel like starting a discussion. People have been saying that TNA should adopt a Television Championship. What does everyone think about the same idea being applied to the WWE?

Have the belt be inter-promotional, and defended on both RAW and SmackDown! every week. To start it off, have SmackDown! get the right to declare the Champion, seeing as they won the brand feud at Survivor Series. Have William Regal say he wants the belt, but have Paul London or someone get in his face about it. A tournament takes place to decide the TV Champion.

William Regal beats Scotty 2 Hotty to advance. Fairly clean and straight forward match. Paul Burchill defeats Funaki to advance with something awesome. Paul London beats Simon Dean, and Brian Kendrick beats Nunzio. Completely pulling stuff out of my ass here. Anyway, the final brackets look something like this:

William Regal vs. Paul Burchill
Paul London vs. Brian Kendrick

Regal says he really wants the belt, but Burchill won't forfeit his match against Regal, and the two go to a 10-minute draw. London and Kendrick are put into a match with no time limit to decide who will be Champion. Maybe have this take place at WrestleMania or something? London goes over well past the 10-minute mark (Hell, have them go over 20) and becomes TV Champion.

I think something like this would be a good idea, because it can really help guys get over. They're never going to put Paul London over Kurt Angle, but they might just have him go ten minutes with him, which allows London to get the moral victory over Angle. Stuff like that can help the guys in the undercard get noticed and develop relationships with the fans. You can play both sides with the belt. The guy who keeps it because his opponents can't beat him within the time limit, and the guy who keeps it because he always destroys his opponents within the time limit. It's probably the title they can do the most with stipulation-wise.

So, do you think it is a good idea or a bad idea?

Pfft
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote