View Single Post
Old 01-20-2006, 11:53 PM   #28
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I think Bret Hart is overrated. I haven't see much of his work, but from what I have seen, he was good, but not that exciting in the ring.

Rob Van Dam is overrated, too, in my opinion. The guy is good, not overly fantastic, wet thyself. His ECW stuff, from what I've seen is more exciting, but his WWE stuff has been strike, strike, rolling/flipping move, springboard kick. This could probably be attributed to the WWE, though. The same limits have been put of guys like Paul London, Brian Kendrick, Jamie Noble, etc.

Chris Masters & Carlito are overrated in terms of how bad they are perceived. Carlito is quite good. If people can wet themselves over a toned down Van Dam and blame it on the WWE, people should wet themselves over a toned down Carlito and blame it on the WWE. Chris Masters isn't exactly fantastic these days, but it's not his fault he's been given the spotlight, and he has done everything asked of him to the best of his ability. The guy has a nice powerslam, too.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote