Thread: Do you think the WWE should go with an unpredictable Royal Rumble Winner?
View Single Post
Old 01-26-2006, 08:03 PM   #17
Dorkchop
facebook.com/bloquemen
 
Posts: 5,452
Dorkchop puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Dorkchop puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Dorkchop puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Dorkchop puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Dorkchop puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Dorkchop puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Dorkchop puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Dorkchop puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Dorkchop puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)
Yes. For the most part, the WWE is very predictable. We're only a month into this year and it's been good so far for surprising moments.

Since about 1998 (probably earlier) the Royal Rumble winner has been pretty predictable. With the exception to 2000, A lot of guys could have won that Rumble.

It won't happen, but it would be sweet. Hell, even Shelton would be pretty unpredictable.

I would mark the fuck out if Kane came in the Rumble (not early into it) and completely cleaned house and won the rumble. I'm talking like 15 to more eliminations. That would be sick.
Dorkchop is offline   Reply With Quote