Thread: TNA. The WWE alternative?
View Single Post
Old 01-28-2006, 10:22 PM   #11
Xero
He's Here
 
Xero's Avatar
 
Posts: 60,735
Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox
Sorry, but most of the time TNA is mentioned around here you'll have about twenty hardcore WWE fans on your ass about how shitty it is. It's kind of been phased out.

I do agree, TNA is great and I enjoy watching their product more than the WWE's.
Hey hey hey, TNA is shit MOST OF THE TIME, but on the flip side (and this is coming from someone you probably consider a hardcore WWE fan), the WWE is shit MOST OF THE TIME.

TNA has some great talent, and I've got to admit I'm a Joe mark (whenever I watch TNA, anyway), but they're still a LOOOONNNGGG way off to be considered a WWE alternative.

And on that note, Nick Mondo and spot monkeys (half the TNA roster) suck.
Xero is offline   Reply With Quote