Thread: Impact Rating Drops 36%
View Single Post
Old 02-10-2006, 11:33 PM   #39
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Heat
One could argue that your making a big deal out of the HUGE difference, despite the time differential between the time WWF[E] has been around VS. TNA could be attributed to you being a fanboy. Watch who you call what.

That's what I LOVE about fellow "net" wrestling fans. They like to label people under categories without labeling themselves. Hypocrocy at its greatest
I love how you were the one who started in on the "WWE mark" card, and then call ME a hypocrite for calling you a fanboy.

You really have no argument, do you? 2 million viewers is a huge gap in the television business period, and I am not playing it up. You, however, are playing it down and trying to act as though it's not that big a difference and that this is a big thing for them. You then argue facts which don't conclude anything. You're trying to back up fanboyism while hiding behind "facts."

In other words, take a look in the mirror before you cry "hypocrite." You've been chomping at fans all over the place if they don't agree with you on TNA, poking at them as WWE marks, etc., which reeks of rabid fanboyism.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote