Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kane Knight
Please, stop being retarded. Most people would never see the FF movie...It NEVER even made it to DVD, so you have to be an übernerd to have even seen it. Batman and Robin had promise because it was part of a successful franchise. This isn't irrelevent, as it establishes that more people will have seen the latter over the former, which is exactly the point. More people will consider some mainstream movie everyone's seen to be the worst they've ever seen, because...gasp...They've seen it!
You chose some pretty uncommon movies for people to have seen, and compared them to a mainstream "blockbuster."
In fact, you may have chosen 3 Marvel movies people were LEAST likely to have seen. FF: Never released anywhere. Nick Fury: D2DVD far as I know, not widely distributed, shown occasionally on Sci-Fi, but most people haven't seen it. Captain America: So horrible they originally canned it, barely made a showing for itself.
But please, try and change the argument, because God knows you're not bright enough to grasp the relevance of "number of people who've seen a movie" to "why B&R gets mentioned in worst movies you've ever seen."
|
Okay, fine, bad example, whatever.
Can't believe I'm trying to clarify what should have been an obvious point, but... How about
:
Jurassic Park III
Shark Tale
xXx
Look Who's Talking
The Matrix Revolutions
Godzilla (1998 remake)
Lara Croft: Tomb Raider
The Flintstones
2 Fast 2 Furious
All of these movies made at least $125,000,000 domestically, and I contend they're all worse than Batman & Robin.
So, not only did MORE PEOPLE see these movies, they're also WORSE than B&R. Thus, I find it very hard to believe, as disappointing as it was, that B&R was the worst movie anyone has ever seen.