View Single Post
Old 03-04-2006, 06:39 AM   #2
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,571
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sting Fan
Do you think perhpas TNA would have trademarked it?

Because if not they are either A. Idiots or B. Stole it from elsewhere, I dont know which lol.
That's the thing though, is it possible to trademark a match concept? Booking it under the same name, and making money off the exact same concept would be illegal, but if TNA found the money to build a cage with four extra in-built rooms, and had people enter at a specific time intervals and get eliminated would they be in trouble from the WWE?

TNA can do Ladder Matches, Cage Matches, etc. Why can't the WWE do a "Cable Match"? I'm not a lawyer, so I don't know. If it is trademarkable, I'd say TNA would have done it by now.

Maybe part of the WWE's reasoning for not doing the match is because they don't have a name for it? Let's throw ideas out there for them.

The only one I can come up with is "Cruiserweight Crossing"...
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote