I'm not going to waste much more time arguing with you, because honestly, I have better things to do. But c'mon... you can't honestly say that Rey's consistently safer. Everything in wrestling has a risk. Rey could injure himself if he slips on a 619. His springboard hurricanrana can give a severe neck injury if taken wrong or botched. He does a moonsault, which itself can harm people if taken or done wrong.
I think it all comes down to this: you feel that Rey is performing better than all the other Cruisers, but I don't really see it... at least not as drastically as you imply. Again, you constantly preach innovation, but Rey's been doing the same moves he's done for the past four years.
Why didn't anyone else bring the moves he did to the WWE? Because he was among the first Cruisers! He had the benefit of establishing his moveset first! Out of the original WWE stock of Cruisers, you've only got Rey, Chavo, Helms, and Funaki left.
And here's your game back at you:
Quote:
|
See the trouble with this is that TNA does not have this kind of budget.
|
How do you know this? Have you seen it? Do you work for TNA? How do you know they don't have money stockpiled somewhere, or reserve funds to use on big stars? This information isn't found on the TNA site, so how can you argue this?
Finally, your continued assertion of the crowd mentality reduces wrestling fans to little kids. It's like bullying, where a few kids pick on one guy, then the rest of the class joins in because they don't know better. So if wrestling fans don't know better, how can they actually like Cena, as you originally argued? You can't say that the booers are only a bunch of sour apples, and most everyone else really likes Cena, then turn around and say they don't know any better. If they don't know any better, how can you say they like him in the first place?