Thread: Playing Devil's Advocate for a second...
View Single Post
Old 03-25-2006, 09:02 PM   #7
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,527
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by legend
I actually have a weird feeling Henry is going over.
I know what you mean. The Undertaker winning seems to be going through the motions. Mark Henry winning, in the WWE's mind at least, would be shocking. I can see them giving Henry the win, just because no one expects it to happen.

Unfortunately, I can see the WWE doing this with Edge vs. Foley as well. Everyone expects Edge to win, well, because it's the logical thing to do. Whilst some may make the same arguement for Henry/Taker, was putting these two together on the WrestleMania card a logical move in the first place? I'm probably not going to stand-by this philosophy, nor have I actually thought about what it means, but I'm going to use it anyway for the Hell of it (something the WWE was probably thinking when they booked Taker/Henry):

You can't use logic to get out of illogical situations.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote