Thread: Just watched this week's SmackDown! *SPOILERS*
View Single Post
Old 03-25-2006, 11:02 PM   #8
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alienoid06
Yeah, I was wondering the percentage of WrestleMania that was actually wrestling. You'd think they'd make it at least 80% wrestling, even if that ratio drops after WrestleMania. It would truly make WrestleMania special if the cameras didn't leave the ringside area. Between matches, maybe have some kind of promo for Backlash air, something for Judgment Day, something for ECW One Night Stand, something for Summerslam and for the others have the commentators talk about the match, and have them talk about their picks to win.

If the percentage of wrestling at WrestleMania has only been 40%, then they won't be able to add much of anything.
It's closer to 60% wrestling. I never sat down and timed it exactly, but it's ABOUT 60-40, meaning there's still SOMEWHAT more wrestling, but they seem to be pushing elsewhere.

I'd probably chain orgasm if I saw a PPV with more like 80% matches.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote