Thread: Just watched this week's SmackDown! *SPOILERS*
View Single Post
Old 03-25-2006, 11:08 PM   #9
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,529
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kane Knight
It's closer to 60% wrestling. I never sat down and timed it exactly, but it's ABOUT 60-40, meaning there's still SOMEWHAT more wrestling, but they seem to be pushing elsewhere.

I'd probably chain orgasm if I saw a PPV with more like 80% matches.
60-40 still isn't brilliant. I think the roster split has hurt the WWE as far as WrestleMania goes, because they build up more talent, true, but they then are limited by the fact they've forgotten how to put on a wrestling show, and not everything fits in.

This WrestleMania won't be the one to change that, I know, but if they somehow work out ways to cut down certain matches that don't need length to be effective (Booker T vs. The Boogeyman for example), then they might be able to squeeze more talent into the show.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote