View Single Post
Old 03-26-2006, 02:08 PM   #2
M-A-G
Higher. Further. Faster.
 
M-A-G's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,213
M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
One thing that bugs me about the whole "Is TNA good?" argument is that when someone starts mentioning the bad things about TNA, someone comes in and gives the defense of "Well, the WWE is doing bad things, too". Of COURSE the WWE is doing bad things and implements elements that suck. No one's talking about the WWE though. The focus is on TNA and why it's been difficult for some viewers to watch. I have yet to enjoy a single TNA event and like I mentioned sometime ago, I actually fell asleep for the first time watching a wrestling show and that show was, you guessed it, iMPACT. No one's saying the WWE is the most awesomest thing in wrestling right now because a thread pointing out the flaws and problems could be posted in a heartbeat. People are just venting their grievances about TNA. I'm sure these people are already familiar with WWE and their negatives so they don't need somebody to point them out in an attempt to defend the negatives of TNA. When you point out to someone that WWE is also doing horrible things that TNA is doing, you're agreeing that TNA is horrible as well and making the case for that person.
M-A-G is offline   Reply With Quote