Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fox
First, to say that it's "okay" for Triple H to hold down up and coming talent (or even just talent that's far better than he is) because WWE is "the alpha male" is ridiculous.
|
New Rule: Posters must pass a literacy test or be banned.
Or, to break it down for you, Fox, "can afford to" =/= "it is okay."
It's really that simple. I am not endorsing it as good, I am saying that they can get away with it at the current time.
And yes, they can afford to. You can comapre them to WCW, but until TNA has an actual attitude era, it doesn't fucking matter. WWE could main event the same guys WCW did and still be on top, because WWE still has more crossover promotional appeal.
To be honest, I'd cream myself if TNA ever put WWE in a make or break situation, adapt or die. I'd be sitting there chain orgasming over that shit, but it's nowhere near that. TNA just isn't strong enough. WWE can bargain on a name, TNA has to rely on the faith of the network hosting them. They can't even shake a primteime slot. And you can argue that they might someday be capable of an Attitude Era, it's not there now, and it's not close.
But since most of your post was a fanboyish attempt to justify TNA being in the right direction, I'll just write it off as rabid fanboyism siezing up an otherwise normally passable mind.
I just want to say: You were really full of shit in that rant. But whatever. Not worth arguing with blind fanboyism.