Thread: WCW>WWE In terms of Titles Meaning Something....
View Single Post
Old 05-20-2006, 07:33 PM   #4
Xero
He's Here
 
Xero's Avatar
 
Posts: 60,735
Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Are we talking now or in the past WWE? Because if it's the past this is hugely debatable, especially your US (IC) title comment.

The IC title was used as a stepping stone in the WWE to the world title/main event status. I'd say it did it more for the WWE than the US title did for WCW. Some "no-name" (at the time of reign) IC champions I can rattle off my head include Shawn Michaels, Bret Hart, Bulldog, Razor Ramon (AKA Scott Hall), The Rock, Steve Austin, Triple H...

Currently, though, that's true.
Last edited by Xero; 05-20-2006 at 07:48 PM.
Xero is offline   Reply With Quote