Thread: WCW>WWE In terms of Titles Meaning Something....
View Single Post
Old 05-21-2006, 10:45 PM   #23
Pepsi Man
 
Pepsi Man's Avatar
 
Posts: 15,983
Pepsi Man has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Pepsi Man has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Pepsi Man has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Pepsi Man has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Pepsi Man has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Pepsi Man has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Pepsi Man has a great deal of rep (15,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Savior
I dunno I think vinces run was more retarded then Arquettes.

HHH (c) challenges Vinnie to a match for no reason.
Vince reluctantly accepts
Vince goes over HHH with the help of austin
Vince gives the belt up
HHH wins the belt back in a 6 pack match

Eric Bishoff and Jarret bully Daivd, DDPs (c) buddy
A match is set up Eric/Jarret vs DDP/David
David pins Eric to win the title
Jarret Defeats DDP with the help of David

I think the WCW one was better. WWEs version just seemed useless.
Oh, okay. So pinning someone who's NOT the champion in a tag team match should make you World Champion, in theory, but pinning down the shoulders of the World Champion shouldn't? Can someone please explain this logic to me?
Pepsi Man is offline   Reply With Quote