Quote:
Hey Maaty, was putting the older Booker T over the young up and coming Bobby Lashey the right decision, even though it was in a tourney that's historically been designed to promote new YOUNG talent?
Or was it ok because Lashley has no personality?
Was it okay for Khali, who also has no personality, to completely destroy Undertaker in a match that made no sense in terms of each wrestler's credibility?
Or was it ok because he's the young guy they're pushing?
Just wondering, actually.
|
Booker T going over is a tough one. It depends on where they go with this. If Booker T is going to go for the championship, then yes it is the right decision in this case to go over the young talent. Booker T deserves one big run and he has been real good lately. So if they plan on Booker T world champ soon, it was the right decision.
If they're not going for that, then Lashley should have gotten the win. But otherwise, Lashlet will get his chance. He is young, Booker T needs it more.
Khali being HIRED by the WWE is unacceptable. Well, to the main roster anyway. This guy can't wrestle and he is terrible on the mic. If they want this guy, okay, but put him through a year of training and see what happens. If he's still as bad in the ring, fire him. Khali definetely didn't deserve to go over the Undertaker or to be on the main roster when guys like CHRIS BENOIT aren't being pushed!
I never said Mark Henry is young. Don't attribute it to me.