View Single Post
Old 05-24-2006, 05:53 PM   #70
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I'm actually wondering if this is a new strategy by the WWE. Sure, the first set seems to come from an independant source, but this confusion has got a lot of interest from net fans. Some may even tune in to watch SmackDown! this week, just to clear it up.

Maybe conflicting spoilers can be the WWE's way of gathering more viewers for their taped shows.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote