Thread: Join me in asking... Is ECW really that bad?
View Single Post
Old 07-08-2006, 02:11 AM   #14
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,524
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I must say this again, though, right now I'm more interested in seeing the new ECW fold and the talent being re-introduced to WWE storylines. The FBI would be a nice edition to SmackDown!, Jazz and Shelly can help the Women's Division, Test would patch a few holes on SmackDown!, Mike Knox has more chance of being accepted and CM Punk vs. John Cena is a feud I would pay to see.

When I am more interested in seeing something fail than seeing it success, it is not out of the shitter yet.

I think ECW's new "sports entertainent extension" will help it in the long run. Sabu, Tommy Dreamer and The Sandman will hopefully keep the hardcore ECW fans interested, and if they basically let the talent do what they want wrestling-wise, it may work out. Of course they aren't going to let them go flat-out, but just be a little more relaxed. Specifically with guys like Sabu, Tony Mamaluke and Little Guido.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote