Thread: Stephen Colbert gets banned from Wikipedia
View Single Post
Old 08-05-2006, 11:28 AM   #8
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Downunder
That's the one thing that gets me everytime someone links to wikipedia or quotes wikipedia to prove their argument, bloody pointless. It like most of the interne is un-moderated crap - yes wiki have mods, but unless they know everything, how are they going to correct me if i edit the West Coast eagles page to say they won the F.A cup in 1968.

actually I might do that

brb
This came up on another board, where someone posted this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...oldid=61462092

It took more than two weeks just to remove:

"EMOS ARE FAGS







STUPID EMO MUSIC
ITS JUST PEOPLE SCREAMING

FUCKERS"

How the fuck can they be expected to be accurate, if they can't even take slurs out?
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote