Quote:
|
You seem to be the only one who doesn't see it. Just because you choose to ignore it, claim it doesn't exist, does not make it so.
|
The reason I'm not seeing it is because it's not there. It's just empty rambling from you, you haven't pointed out a real contradiction.
Quote:
|
They did put it out of the picture by not doing it.
|
Just because you don't do it, doesn't mean its "out of the picture". ECW did some more violent things, they just haven't got to it yet. If ECW was still around, you bet they would have had at least one such match.
Quote:
|
Paul Heyman disagrees with you.
|
And where did he say that ECW was not extreme?
The E in ECW disagrees with you. Extreme is in the name of ECW. EXTREME is E C W.
Quote:
Actually, I was challenging your mental capacity. However, what you accuse me of being "stupid" for is nothing more than a simple, commonplace event. You see, and I wouldn't need to explain this to someone who wasn't "special," In the process of replying, other people can reply too. This is what happened. It's unrealistic to expect this to never happen, and flat out retarded to try and make a big case out of it. "OH LOL I HIT REPLY BEFORE HE DID HES A MORON."
Again, just because you want something to work that way does not mean that it does.
|
UH HUH, especially after I point out to you that I adressed it, and YOU STILL don't see it. Sure thing. It's not my fault you don't know the refresh button.
Quote:
|
Which is why they took a pay cut to go to TNA, right? TNA doesn't pay the kind of cash they would have gotten regardless. In other words, your argument just died.
|
Yes, TNA doesn't pay like WWE. Valid point. HOWEVER, this doesn't negate my point. Let me explain what happened. The Dudleys, knowing how extremely valuable they are, wanted a higher pay, WWE said no, so they left ON PRINCIPLE because they hoped that this will show WWE what a mistake they made and the WWE will give them the money they deserve. WWE didn't see their mistake, but if they saw it now and offered them an enormous contract, they'd take it. I mean, look at test, he said he doesnt like WWE, yet WWE offered him a big enough contract and he's back.
Quote:
|
How are they innovators? They're doing the same stuff Tards were doing back when Matt and Jeff debuted, back when Austin was still Stunning Steve, and back when Mick Foley was still an unknown. Again, you refer to them in terms of innovation, when their "hardcore" is the same backyard garbage that's had over 15 years of fame.
|
They are innovators because they are putting these matches when most are not. Innovation is not just about being first, it's also about pushing something that others don't. CZW isn't afraid of doing REAL hardcore matches and their wrestlers aren't afraid either. They are HARDCORE, not "fake" Hardcore like the new ECW.
Quote:
|
That's not what people are saying, or what they're claiming you're saying. If you're going to question comprehension, don't be such a hypocrite.
|
If it's not, why is everyone constantly flooding me with names of technical wrestlers in ECW?