Thread: Which wrestler do you like that you know you shouldn't?
View Single Post
Old 08-19-2006, 03:05 PM   #75
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox
Nobody likes TNA because they have a six sided ring. The six sided ring is neither a detriment or an advantage for TNA; it's just what they use. It's really not a factor when deciding whether you're going to watch the show or not.

And the booking is pretty bland and shitty most of the time, but I blame a lot of that on the fact that they only have one hour of TV a week. At least they have good wrestling, which is something WWE has been seriously lacking.


by the way, I'm ashamed to say I still mark for Ultimate Warrior's old matches.
Nobody? Considering wrestling fans RIGHT HERE ON THIS SITE have used it, I'd say you're retarded or ignorant.

And you're making excuses for bland and boring wrestling on TV? Come on, leave that to WWE fans. TNA's supposed to be an alternative, not WWE lite.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote