Thread: NCAA Football 2006 Thread
View Single Post
Old 09-10-2006, 05:09 AM   #234
DrA
 
Posts: 24,527
DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCWWF
Ohio State was the better team, and Texas not having those cornerbacks really killed them. Not sure how effective they could have been, but the Ohio State recievers were amazing.

Am I the only one who doesn't like Texas Stadium? It fits a lot of people, but it just has such a weird look. One side has a giant upper deck, the other is small, the stands on the end are small, I don't know. It doesn't have the same feel as a regular Big 12 stadium, it just looks like the Philadelphia Eagles field done wrong. I dunno, they should just put that giant upper deck on both sides, it's not like they would struggle to find fans.
Texas not having a quarterback killed them. No other point should overlap that.
DrA is offline